[Elecraft] KAT2 - Assy Manual Clarification; Typo's?

Don Wilhelm [email protected]
Fri Jan 2 23:40:04 2004


Paul,

First question:
The most conservative approach is to follow the instructions in the Builders
alert.  During Field Test of the KAT2, A few of us found that the original
method of installing the washers would cause the boards to be too close
together - the BNC connector body was higher than the spacing provided by
the spacers alone.  As I recall, the folks at Elecraft found a different
supplier for the connectors (slightly shorter ones) and the original problem
went away.

If the top of the BNC connectors do not interferwith the spacing between the
boards (causing one or both boards to bow upward), all is OK no matter which
set of instructions you use.

Third question:
Yes, the center conductor is soldered to the RF point and the braid is
soldered to the GND point.

I don't have my manual handy, so I can't comment on your second question,
perhaps others will help.  (Or check the errata sheet to see if it is
mentioned there).

73,
Don W3FPR

----- Original Message -----

> Would appreciate clarification of several items:
>
> 1.  Regarding placement of lock washers, on page
> 12 of the manual it indates that on the ATU
> control board, the spacers are supposed to be
> between the PC board and screws; this is contrary
> to what's indicated on page 6 of the manual and
> contrary to what 26 Feb 2000 KAT2 Builder Alert.
>
> Am I  correct that the intention here is to place
> spacers between the standoffs and the PC board
> with respect to BOTH the ATU control board and
> the L-C board?  (So its screw - atu board -
> spacer - standoff - spacer - LC board - screw?)
>
> 2.  I assume the reference in the first step on
> manual page 12 to RF-P3 as mating to the ATU
> connector J7 is a typo; the correct reference is
> supposed to be to RF-P6?
>
> 3. On page 11, the third to last step is supposed
> to be solder the braid and center conductor at
> one end of the coax cable to the pads labeled
> "GND and RF" (vice "RF and GND"), right?
>