[Elecraft] K2 rev B low sensitivity
Wallace, Andy
[email protected]
Thu Feb 13 12:38:02 2003
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron D'Eau Claire [mailto:[email protected]]
>
> Select your narrowest filter.
>
> Turn up the gain so you hear "band noise" - the background QRN that is
> always there.
>
> Disconnect the antenna.
>
> If the noise level drops noticeably, you K2 is hearing as well as any
> receiver with a similar bandwidth.
Great point, Ron. Actually I had thought of your earlier posts on the
subject
when doing the signal tracing. After resoldering the Q22 area and having
good sensitivity again, I did verify that on 80 and 10 I could hear the
difference with the antenna connected vs. not.
> SOME K2's seem to have relatively low audio system gain. Ops complain
> that they have to run the Audio Gain control way up - almost
> full "open" to get adequate gain
Well with the preamp on, both my K2 and the K1 are comfortable to
listen to -- through their speakers -- at about 9:00. (Before resoldering
the Q22 area, it was more like 12:00.) My difficulty was not having a K2
to compare to -- I would hate to have this rig for years and then discover
it wasn't as nice as it could have been due to a construction error/fault.
Before resoldering Q22/C161/RFC11, it took over 300 uV to get S-9 on 40
with the preamp off. Now it's 120 or so....quite a difference!
> Using a pre-amp when you don't need one means
> that you are reducing the dynamic range of the receiver.
Understood -- in my case I am using a terrible antenna, just 35' long,
with no prospect of improvement anytime soon. So I may need to use the
preamp in most cases. Hopefully the KAT2 will help, as much as the KAT1
helps my K1 on receive.
> But that is not a good indicator of whether your K2 can
> "hear" weak signals as good as another receiver.
Of course -- but by calibrating "by the book" and injecting a signal
of x microvolts for S-9, it gives people something to use for comparison.
The best reference would be oscilloscope shots of what to expect in the
signal path for a given input.
Thanks, Ron. I've stopped worrying and now I can look forward to
filling all the empty connectors inside. :-)
Andy