[Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN

[n4dsp]

Art,
your an amazing fellow also. You would change that pic which
has been on your website for 20 years and because of me you
took it off! Are you thinned skin or what? I don't care to check
out your new one.

Like you I paid my $89 for DX4WIN and another $50 bucks for
two additional versions over the years. You like your program
and I like mine. You are happy with your present setup and I
like to see some things improved to which I am willing to pay
another $25 for another revision. That is your choice not to do
that. So what's the problem?

Guys like you, Zoran, Bob come out of the woodwork whenever persons
like myself suggest some improvements and then demand
what improvements we had in mind so you can then pick it to pieces
and ridicule. We know your game. You guys are the "Reflector Terrorists"!!
LOL.

Look Art. I want to see continued improvements and want DX4WIN to 
continue to
develop. But you and Bob need to spend some time at the local Senior
Citizens Center and play some cards with these folks and work a day or
two dispensing out food for the homeless rather than asking N4DSP for a
Santy Claus Christmas Wish List for DX4WIN.


On 1/5/2014 4:27 AM, Art - W6KY wrote:
> John,
>
> You are one amazing fellow. You are the first one in 20 years
> that has had a negative comment about the pic on QRZ, What
> is offensive about it? I did change it tho. I await your approval...
>
> Also,my eMail to you below. Where are the 'snarky' comments.
> I simply asked you to list what you would like to see added/changed
> on DX4WIN.
>
> I suggest you switch to DXLab and enjoy it's benefits while the rest
> of us use this outdated,cumbersome,difficult and as you stated
>  'confusing to you' program...
>
> 73, Art  W6KY
> www.w6ky.com
> .....................................................................................................
> I refuse to get in a battle of wits with someone who is only half 
> prepared.
> Thomas Jefferson
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* n4dsp <n4dsp at triad.rr.com>
> *To:* Art - W6KY <W6KY at yahoo.com>; "dx4win at mailman.qth.net" 
> <dx4win at mailman.qth.net>
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 4, 2014 11:34 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN
>
> Art,
> the pic on qrz.com/w6ky <http://qrz.com/w6ky> is pretty offensive. You 
> should
> change that.
>
>
> On 1/5/2014 12:11 AM, Art - W6KY wrote:
>> John,
>> Zoran asked you a simple question of what you would like to see
>> implemented in DX4WIN. You started this thread but haven't offered
>> a single suggestion of improvements to DX4WIN.
>> Let's have the list so maybe Paul can implement some of them if
>> they are noteworthy..
>> QRX
>> 73, Art   W6KY
>> www.w6ky.com <http://www.w6ky.com/>
>> .....................................................................................................
>> Gleðileg jól og farsælt komandi ár from Iceland
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* n4dsp <n4dsp at triad.rr.com> <mailto:n4dsp at triad.rr.com>
>> *To:* dx4win at mailman.qth.net <mailto:dx4win at mailman.qth.net>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, January 4, 2014 6:57 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN
>>
>> Zoran,
>>
>> You ask me to to give you and other's on this reflector some idea on 
>> what exactly is it that I am looking for.
>> Let's start with you Zoran. What would you like to see and for what 
>> purpose? Or are you on the dx4win
>> design team which implements these idea's into reality? Your concrete 
>> idea's on this matter instead of
>> flaming would be nice.
>>
>> john
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/4/2014 9:23 PM, WA7AA wrote:
>> > On 04.01.2014 11:46, n4dsp wrote:
>> >> Why is it and it's not just with this reflector when post's come 
>> out like mine
>> >> expressing dissatisfaction with DX4WIN and expecting and willing 
>> to pay
>> >> for revisions, the DX4WIN Addicts come out stating exactly what 
>> Erkki stated?
>> >>
>> >
>> > I don't want to get into the flame war here, but maybe you can give 
>> us some idea on what exactly is it that you are looking for as far as 
>> DX4Win changing and being "on the move"? Some concrete examples would 
>> be nice instead of flaming, since I am sure every one if us has a 
>> list of wanted features or such. I took a brief look of the DXLab and 
>> frankly, I don't see what is so revolutionary about it, aside from a 
>> few features that may be interesting to have, but are nowhere near 
>> making it the pinnacle of a logger you make it out to be. To draw a 
>> parallel to your Win 3.5 metaphor, I don't need a change that will 
>> take me from WinXP to Win 8.
>> >
>> > 73,
>> >
>> > Zoran WA7AA
>> > ______________________________________________________________
>> > DX4WIN mailing list
>> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
>> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> > Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net <mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net>
>> >
>> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> >
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> DX4WIN mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net <mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net>
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net <http://www.qsl.net/>
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>
>
>