[Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN
Art - W6KY
w6ky at yahoo.com
Sun Jan 5 04:27:58 EST 2014
John,
You are one amazing fellow. You are the first one in 20 years
that has had a negative comment about the pic on QRZ, What
is offensive about it? I did change it tho. I await your approval...
Also,my eMail to you below. Where are the 'snarky' comments.
I simply asked you to list what you would like to see added/changed
on DX4WIN.
I suggest you switch to DXLab and enjoy it's benefits while the rest
of us use this outdated,cumbersome,difficult and as you stated
'confusing to you' program...
73, Art W6KY
www.w6ky.com
.....................................................................................................
I refuse to get in a battle of wits with someone who is only half prepared.
Thomas Jefferson
________________________________
From: n4dsp <n4dsp at triad.rr.com>
To: Art - W6KY <W6KY at yahoo.com>; "dx4win at mailman.qth.net" <dx4win at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 4, 2014 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN
Art,
the pic on qrz.com/w6ky is pretty offensive. You should
change that.
On 1/5/2014 12:11 AM, Art - W6KY wrote:
John,
>Zoran asked you a simple question of what you would like to see
>implemented in DX4WIN. You started this thread but haven't
offered
>a single suggestion of improvements to DX4WIN.
>Let's have the list so maybe Paul can implement some of them if
>they are noteworthy..
>QRX
>73, Art W6KY
>www.w6ky.com
>
>.....................................................................................................
>Gleðileg jól og farsælt komandi ár from Iceland
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: n4dsp <n4dsp at triad.rr.com>
>To: dx4win at mailman.qth.net
>Sent: Saturday, January 4, 2014 6:57 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN
>
>
>Zoran,
>
>You ask me to to give you and other's on this reflector
some idea on what exactly is it that I am looking for.
>Let's start with you Zoran. What would you like to see and
for what purpose? Or are you on the dx4win
>design team which implements these idea's into reality?
Your concrete idea's on this matter instead of
>flaming would be nice.
>
>john
>
>
>
>On 1/4/2014 9:23 PM, WA7AA wrote:
>> On 04.01.2014 11:46, n4dsp wrote:
>>> Why is it and it's not just with this reflector
when post's come out like mine
>>> expressing dissatisfaction with DX4WIN and
expecting and willing to pay
>>> for revisions, the DX4WIN Addicts come out
stating exactly what Erkki stated?
>>>
>>
>> I don't want to get into the flame war here, but
maybe you can give us some idea on what exactly is it that
you are looking for as far as DX4Win changing and being
"on the move"? Some concrete examples would be nice
instead of flaming, since I am sure every one if us has a
list of wanted features or such. I took a brief look of
the DXLab and frankly, I don't see what is so
revolutionary about it, aside from a few features that may
be interesting to have, but are nowhere near making it the
pinnacle of a logger you make it out to be. To draw a
parallel to your Win 3.5 metaphor, I don't need a change
that will take me from WinXP to Win 8.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Zoran WA7AA
>>
______________________________________________________________
>> DX4WIN mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>
>______________________________________________________________
>DX4WIN mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net
>
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
More information about the DX4WIN
mailing list