[Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN
Art - W6KY
w6ky at yahoo.com
Sun Jan 5 14:25:27 EST 2014
John,
Thanks for throwing that bomb regarding my picture
on QRZ. It reminded me to change the picture.
I changed it to an even better picture of that sweet YL.
What do you have against female hams?
73, Merry Christmas, Happy New Year
Have a Nice Day
Art W6KY
www.w6ky.com
.....................................................................................................
Before you came along we were hungry. Now we are fed up. Oscar Wilde
________________________________
From: n4dsp <n4dsp at triad.rr.com>
To: Art - W6KY <W6KY at yahoo.com>; "dx4win at mailman.qth.net" <dx4win at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 5, 2014 1:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN
Art,
your an amazing fellow also. You would change that pic which
has been on your website for 20 years and because of me you
took it off! Are you thinned skin or what? I don't care to check
out your new one.
Like you I paid my $89 for DX4WIN and another $50 bucks for
two additional versions over the years. You like your program
and I like mine. You are happy with your present setup and I
like to see some things improved to which I am willing to pay
another $25 for another revision. That is your choice not to do
that. So what's the problem?
Guys like you, Zoran, Bob come out of the woodwork whenever persons
like myself suggest some improvements and then demand
what improvements we had in mind so you can then pick it to pieces
and ridicule. We know your game. You guys are the "Reflector
Terrorists"!!
LOL.
Look Art. I want to see continued improvements and want DX4WIN to
continue to
develop. But you and Bob need to spend some time at the local Senior
Citizens Center and play some cards with these folks and work a day
or
two dispensing out food for the homeless rather than asking N4DSP
for a
Santy Claus Christmas Wish List for DX4WIN.
On 1/5/2014 4:27 AM, Art - W6KY wrote:
John,
>
>You are one amazing fellow. You are the first one in 20 years
>that has had a negative comment about the pic on QRZ, What
>is offensive about it? I did change it tho. I await your
approval...
>
>Also,my eMail to you below. Where are the 'snarky' comments.
>I simply asked you to list what you would like to see
added/changed
>on DX4WIN.
>
>I suggest you switch to DXLab and enjoy it's benefits while the
rest
>of us use this outdated,cumbersome,difficult and as you stated
> 'confusing to you' program...
>
>73, Art W6KY
>www.w6ky.com
>
>.....................................................................................................
>I refuse to get in a battle of wits with someone who is only
half prepared.
>Thomas Jefferson
>
>
>________________________________
> From: n4dsp <n4dsp at triad.rr.com>
>To: Art - W6KY <W6KY at yahoo.com>; "dx4win at mailman.qth.net" <dx4win at mailman.qth.net>
>Sent: Saturday, January 4, 2014 11:34 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN
>
>
>
>Art,
>the pic on qrz.com/w6ky is pretty offensive. You should
>change that.
>
>
>
>On 1/5/2014 12:11 AM, Art - W6KY wrote:
>
>John,
>>Zoran asked you a simple question of what you
would like to see
>>implemented in DX4WIN. You started this thread but
haven't offered
>>a single suggestion of improvements to DX4WIN.
>>Let's have the list so maybe Paul can implement
some of them if
>>they are noteworthy..
>>QRX
>>73, Art W6KY
>>www.w6ky.com
>>
>>.....................................................................................................
>>Gleðileg jól og farsælt komandi ár from Iceland
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From: n4dsp <n4dsp at triad.rr.com>
>>To: dx4win at mailman.qth.net
>>Sent: Saturday, January 4, 2014 6:57 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN
>>
>>
>>Zoran,
>>
>>You ask me to to give you and other's on
this reflector some idea on what exactly is
it that I am looking for.
>>Let's start with you Zoran. What would you
like to see and for what purpose? Or are you
on the dx4win
>>design team which implements these idea's
into reality? Your concrete idea's on this
matter instead of
>>flaming would be nice.
>>
>>john
>>
>>
>>
>>On 1/4/2014 9:23 PM, WA7AA wrote:
>>> On 04.01.2014 11:46, n4dsp wrote:
>>>> Why is it and it's not just with
this reflector when post's come out like
mine
>>>> expressing dissatisfaction with
DX4WIN and expecting and willing to pay
>>>> for revisions, the DX4WIN Addicts
come out stating exactly what Erkki stated?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't want to get into the flame war
here, but maybe you can give us some idea on
what exactly is it that you are looking for
as far as DX4Win changing and being "on the
move"? Some concrete examples would be nice
instead of flaming, since I am sure every
one if us has a list of wanted features or
such. I took a brief look of the DXLab and
frankly, I don't see what is so
revolutionary about it, aside from a few
features that may be interesting to have,
but are nowhere near making it the pinnacle
of a logger you make it out to be. To draw a
parallel to your Win 3.5 metaphor, I don't
need a change that will take me from WinXP
to Win 8.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>> Zoran WA7AA
>>>
______________________________________________________________
>>> DX4WIN mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>
>>
>>______________________________________________________________
>>DX4WIN mailing list
>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net
>>
>>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
More information about the DX4WIN
mailing list