[Dx-qsl] NEW DXCC RULES - REMOTE STATIONS

[MG]

Ref the JA example. Where are the controls? Nothing stopping the 
operator from receiving his qsl card from the DX entity he worked 
remotely using the JA remote station and submitting it for credit. To 
counter that the League is relying totally on the integrity of the 
operator not to submit the card. Have they not listened to the bands 
lately? How far is integrity going to go when the card places the 
operator on the Honor Roll? And what does it say to those operators 
busting their chops to work a new one from their home stations? Why bend 
the rules to benefit those making a profit from the Amateur Community. I 
am all for new technology but not at the expense of watering down a 
premier Award system.



On 1/22/2015 04:56 PM, charlie at thegallos.com wrote:
>> I am not certain I read it that way Ken. Why couldn't an operator in the
>> States, or anywhere for that matter,  use the Japanese remote station in
>> your example. >
> Because
> "Transmitter location continues to define a station’s location"
>
> So, if the operator has the legal right to work from JA, he is making a
> contact from JA, doesn't count for his US DXCC
>
> That said, Say you are in Oregon, and you want to work K1N next month on
> say 80m (or 6M!!!) you rent a remote station in Miami, and work K1N.
> Being you are in the same DXCC entity, it still counts to your US DXCC.
>
>
>