[Dx-qsl] SWL data is correct, but

[DE1DXX at aol.com]

In einer eMail vom 24.02.2007 11:01:51 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt  
tom at gm4fdm.com:

I'm  afraid I am considering giving up SWL QSLing entirely.    Nowadays  
it seems a pointless  exercose.


Tom

GM4FDM



Hi Tom,
 
well, it would be great if hams would distinguish between a  59(9) report
and a real given report and mentioning band conditions.
What is in your opinion better? A 59(9) standard report from a ham or a  real 
report
from a SWL station?
 
SWLing is even in our days a good preparation for becoming a Ham. And,  like
hams, SWLs have even fun in hearing local stations (may be they need  this
non-DX for a diploma) or in fighting against QRM and QSB for the real  DX.
It's just a hobby and great fun.... 
 
Have a nice weekend and take care.
 
vy 73
Andreas
SWL DE1DXX --- HAM DO1DXX
QSL-manager DL0KM and DL0M


--------------------------------------------------
Andreas Ibold  - Alpen - GERMANY
JO31GN DOK L14 CQ14 ITU28
Pse, do not forget me... I  need YOUR QSL.... :-)))
Okay in QRZ.com - look at my  QSL-card
--------------------------------------------------
all mails  scanned with latest McAfee Antivirus