[CW] ARRL's Reply Comment re Baud Rate Petition

[Mark K3MSB]

210 Worked on 80M with a vertical and good radial field!

73 Mark K3MSB

Sent from my Android phone
On Jan 11, 2014 6:38 PM, "pa0wv" <pa0wv at amsat.org> wrote:

> I read from the hand of my respected radio friend:
>
>  "To a lesser degree all of the above is true of 80
> meters too but less so, nonetheless a good 80 meter antenna
> is large and a lot of folks do with very limited ones."
>
> Right, but 80m is not for dx but for NVIS , local work. Of course it is
> possible to creep on your knees to Rome, but a plane is easier and faster.
> Also funier when you look at the knee creepers below you,
>
> 500 kHz is much more heavy to produce some ERP, but it is the challenge of
> amateur radio to make some connections with home designed and build
> equipment under sub optimal nearly impossible circumstances,
>
> When you want QRM QRN and QSB free connections at any moment at low costs
> to anybody you imagine: Use the Internet or some phone company.
>
> 73=30 PA0WV
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
> CW List ARCHIVES: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/
> Unsubcribe send email to cw-subscribe at mailman.qth.net
> Support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> =30=
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/attachments/20140112/035606af/attachment.html>