[CW] use of AR

[Roy]

DR,

Again, I am not talking about using AR at the end. I'm ranting about using it within a transmission, ahead of the call signs.

73,  RK



"The AR does have it roots in traffic handling, but ARRL did something that really muddled the soup.  See my previous email if you are interested.  I think ARRL's use - in one instance - is confusing and other radio services K is used, so I just use K at the end."



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. 
  To: CW Reflector 
  Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 9:05 AM
  Subject: Re: [CW] use of AR


  Hello everyone,


  Roy's message and mine passed in the night without seeing each other!


  The AR does have it roots in traffic handling, but ARRL did something that really muddled the soup.  See my previous email if you are interested.  I think ARRL's use - in one instance - is confusing and other radio services K is used, so I just use K at the end.


  73


  DR


  On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Roy <royanjoy at ncn.net> wrote:

    Hi Ron,

    It isn't at all limited to new CW ops. The practice seems especially rampant
    amongst such as FOC. And BTW, I'm not referring at all to traffic handling.

    Roy,   K6XK






------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  ______________________________________________________________
  CW mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net

  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/attachments/20100208/b88c7281/attachment.html