[Boatanchors] question on the SB-610
Bob Macklin
macklinbob at msn.com
Sun Jan 18 21:37:03 EST 2009
You want the SB-610 between the amp and the tuner!
Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Kent (Seattle), Wa,
"Real Radios Glow in the Dark"
----- Original Message -----
From: <eugene at hertzmail.com>
To: <heathkit at mailman.qth.net>; "BOATANCHORS" <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 6:19 PM
Subject: [Boatanchors] question on the SB-610
> Hi there.
>
> I am rearranging my shack (seems I spend more time rearranging than
> operating!). I would like to use my SB-610 to monitor my signal.
>
> To simplify, I have a 1KW amp, then an antenna coupler and then the
> antenna. Would I be better off placing the SB-610 before the antenna
> coupler so that it sees close to 50 ohms on both its input and output?
>
> Or would I be better off placing it after the antenna coupler so that it
> can display my signal, which would reflect whatever the true SWR is
> going out to the antenna?
>
> Put another way, my signal will be going out into an antenna that will
> not really have a perfect match. In fact, it might have SWR of 2:1 or
> 3:1 or worse - even though my antenna coupler is making my amp see 1:1.
>
> I am wondering if this real SWR might have an effect on the quality of
> my transmitted signal? If so, perhaps I should use the SB-610 after the
> coupler to "see" what everyone else will be hearing?
>
> Or does the 610 just give a hoot about SWR?
>
> Thanks for the bandwidth!
> Eugene
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boatanchors Mailing List provided by QSL.net
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
> ----
> List Info: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> Mailman FAQ: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list