[Boatanchors] Re: GB>Best Receiver was ( "Investment Quality" SX-115 )
[email protected]
[email protected]
Fri, 16 Apr 2004 08:25:04 -0500
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> Group,
> Don't recall seeing an SX115 going that high, most top
> out at 3k or less, some just above 1k......however the SX88 which is
> said to be much rarer has gone as high as 10k.That particular one was
> bought by WB6ACU... Was mentioned, perhaps here, that only 450 were
> produced with less than 50 believed surviving.Perhaps some one with
> knowledge about them could lite up the "which is better debate"
> John, WA2FNS
>
I suppose the SX88 must have been a high ticket item even when it was
first introduced and maybe sold to a fairly small market of well heeled
customers. Why else would only 450 have been built? I am assuming that
all 450 built were also sold. If it was such a good rig, I would think
it would have been more widely accepted. More built, more sold, more
happy owners.
Only 50 out of 450 survive? I would think that a high dollar, high
performance radio would have a better survival rate regardless of size
and age. Most people I know take care of things that are useful and/or
valuable. Makes me wonder if it was built around parts that failed and
were not replaceable or difficult to obtain.
I would be interested in hearing from the group about what they think
are the better boatanchors and why. Not just a comparison between the
SX88 and SX115.
If the Drake C-line qualifies as a boatanchor, I am a boatanchor user. I
have a Drake C-line that works well and gets used regularly. My only
other experience with boatachors is a Hallicrafters S-40B that I
restored two years ago. I was not impressed with it. It worked but
performance wise it was not as good as a BC-454 with front end
converters.
I know performance is not the only thing that makes a radio neat and
collectable, but performance is a serious consideration for me. I don't
have a lot of room and can't afford to waste space on stuff I may never
use.
Regards,
Frank Kamp
K5DKZ