[ARRL-OK] RE: ARRL.net address

Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:57:16 -0500

Subject: RE: [OCAPA] Re: [ARRL-OK] RE: ARRL.net address

I do use ARRL.NET.  The simple use of "[email protected]" should be used
such as on QRZ.COM as a single POC (point of contact) for individual
contacts.  I applaud the ARRL for taking the stand to eliminate the
SPAM from my mailbox by not forwarding it.

As I have changed primary ISP servers twice in as many years, I favor
this service as it does provide valuable continuity.  I no longer have
to change email address's posted.  I just have to remember to change
my forwarding which is transparent to the person wanting to contact
me.

MAH
-------------
Subject: [OCAPA] Re: [ARRL-OK] RE: ARRL.net address

* D C Macdonald <[email protected]> [2004 Apr 27 09:09 -0500]:
> Looks to me like a good reason to   NOT
> use the ARRL's mail forwarding.

At least not for mailing lists.  For a "catch-all" use where your real
address may change with some frequency and you want to provide a
stable
address, it is a very useful service.  Again, common sense is the rule
of the day.

73, de Nate >>
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.659 / Virus Database: 423 - Release Date: 4/15/2004

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.659 / Virus Database: 423 - Release Date: 4/15/2004