[ARC5] [Milsurplus] Command Receivers on the Broadcast Band
zakariya.abu at yandex.com
zakariya.abu at yandex.com
Wed Apr 16 04:00:59 EDT 2025
Mark,
Do you happen to know if the YE-ZB system remained only on WW II-vintage
aircraft carriers till 1960, or were the post-war aircraft carriers also
fitted with the system, especially after the Korean War?
Reportedly, in the late 1940s/early 1950s a system that merged the
qualities of the YE-ZB and ILS was developed. It was dubbed the All
Weather Carrier Landing System (AWCLS), and, unfortunately, was prone to
failures. If I'm not mistaken the system operated around the AN/SPN-10
transmitter on board the carrier.
The AWCLS was replaced in the 1960s with the ACLS built around the
SPN-41 and SPN-42. It obviously required more items to be carried
on-board the aircraft like the ASW-25 data link, the ARA-63 ILS
receiver, he ASN-54 approach power compensator that controlled the
throttle, and the APN-154 radar beacon.
By the way, why larger naval aircraft starting from pre-WW II era were
almost universally fitted with the LF/MF ADF while the naval fighters
weren't?
73,
Jan SP5XZG
W dniu 16.04.2025 o 02:12, MARK DORNEY via ARC5 pisze:
> The R-24/ARC-5 beacon receiver had a very short lived military career.
> It was being replaced by the R-4/ARR-2 starting in late 1944. The R-4/
> ARR-2 combined the beacon receivers ( R-23 and R-24 ) with the US Navy
> ZB Homing adapter. And the ZB homing device went out of USN service in
> about 1960. It was replaced by VOR and TACAN.
>
> The Navy really didn’t require a receiver using a directional loop. The
> Transmitter used with the ZB adapter ( YE transmitter ) used a
> directional antenna to send a different cw letter, as well as a
> transmitter specific identifier ( again in cw ) every 30 degrees of the
> of the 360 degree rotation of the directional transmitter antenna. The
> pilot/navigator simply had to listen for what letter they heard on their
> headset to know their position in relation to their landing field
> ( normally an aircraft carrier )
>
> The R-23/ARC-5 and R-24/ARC-5 were set up to use a loop antenna. The ARA
> CBY-46145 and BC-946 ( SCR-274-N) were set up for a single antenna lead.
> The R-4/ARR-2 also had a single antenna lead.
>
>
> Mark D.
> WW2RDO
>
> “In matters of style, float with the current. In matters of Principle,
> stand like a rock. “. - Thomas Jefferson
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 15, 2025, at 2:10 PM, robert meadows <rpmeadow at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
> Not really rare, just the latest iteration of the receivers, from my
> memory of reading the US Navy manuals on the radios. In fact, I have a
> control for the Broadcast receiver that is the standard ARINC width.
> From memory, the USN didn't standardize the ARC/ARA radios until early
> 1960s.
> R
>
> On Tuesday, April 15, 2025 at 02:03:23 PM EDT, J Mcvey via ARC5
> <arc5 at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>
>
> I never saw one of those (ARC?) broadcast receivers with the loop option.
> That's a rare beast.
> The Arc beacon receivers all had the loop option. I've seen lots of those.
>
> On Tuesday, April 15, 2025 at 11:35:05 AM EDT, Al Klase <ark at ar88.net>
> wrote:
>
>
> Gang,
>
> Recent discussion of CBY-46145 and BC-946B bring to mind my experience
> with R-24/ARC-5 as a BCB DX receiver.
> <2012 DX Station.jpg>
>
>
> Here's my log from our radio club's DX contest back in 2012:
>
> <ARC-5 1-22-2012.png>
>
> Sadly, YVKS has been QRT for a while now.
>
> 95% of the time you'll bemuch better off with a tuned loop rather than
> a wire antenna.
>
> More info here: https://www.skywaves.ar88.net/homebrew/ARC-5_PS/
> ARC-5_PS.html <https://www.skywaves.ar88.net/homebrew/ARC-5_PS/
> ARC-5_PS.html>
>
> Have fun,
> AL
>
>
> --
> Al Klase - N3FRQ
> Jersey City, NJ
> http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/ <http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5 <http://
> mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm <http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net <http://www.qsl.net>
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> <https://www.qsl.net/donate.html>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5 <http://
> mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm <http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net <http://www.qsl.net>
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> <https://www.qsl.net/donate.html>
> <2012 DX Station.jpg>
> <ARC-5 1-22-2012.png>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the ARC5
mailing list