[ARC5] What did they talk to?
Unserviceable but Repairable
cosmoline at ba-watch.org
Wed May 4 07:01:05 EDT 2005
First
} AirRadio wrote:
}
} > To use the scr-522 and have repeaters is absurd as there would have
} > to be repeaters in occupied territory and therefore not feasable....
}
That writer is considering repeaters as instruments set up by ham clubs.
IE 146.82/22 on a 100' Rohn 45. I agree that not even the wild bunch
would have considered setting one of these up in Brechtesgarden mall.
The ARC-10, etc. relay is in an airplane 'way up & 'way far away. & it's
a deal where input ~100mhz to antenna in rear & TX ~150mhz from antenna
in nose. No duplexer cavities.
And Dave sez
} Max makes a good point I hadn't considered.
just addressed
} I have no doubt AN/ARC-10 existed at some level
} and that it was used at some time. My argument is
- - - - - -
} fast-advance environment at the close of the war,
} when direct comm between the pilots and headquarters
} would have been more efficient and all the territory
} between HQ and the target was in Allied hands.
} Trying to orbit a couple of "repeater" planes
} to cover raids on Berlin before that time
} would have been suicide;
} you'd have to fix an aircraft in one position
} for a long period over enemy-held territory.
} He'd be a "sitting duck."
In post that started the flap, I sed ther relay planes flew over
western France. In spring '45.
'rm
More information about the ARC5
mailing list