[50mhz] New Repeater ?

[Wayne]

This reminds me of the jerk who put a remote base, IRLP linked, on 146.520.
 This on a mountain near Kingman AZ.
 He didn't seem to see any problem with his hogging the national simplex
calling frequency.
 This seems to be more of a problem as time goes by.
 We have others who use frequencies in between repeater frequencies, causing
interference to more than one frequency at the same time, Not coordinated,
and usually overdeviating to some degree.
 Now, I see that this is related to most bands.

 Wayne WA2YNE
Outgoing and incoming mail is certified Virus Free.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ray Brown" <raybrown@ipa.net>
To: "Christopher Boone" <CBoone@Earthlink.Net>; <50mhz@topica.com>;
<6meter@yahoogroups.com>; <50Mhz@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [50mhz] New Repeater ?


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Boone" <CBoone@Earthlink.Net>
>
> > This morning I am hearing a Repeater CW ID on 6 and the call matches a
> > General Class NE of Houston....but its on 52.525!!! HELLO???? We don't
> > put rptr outputs there folks!!! I sent the guy an email...should be
> > interesting to see what he says..
>
>   If you look closely thru the ARRL Repeater Book, you'll find a few
listings
> that show an output on 52.525. (sigh) We even had a local (EM27) operator
> set up a UHF <> 52.525 "link", he turned it on when we had a local 52.525
> net (usually every Thursday night, in case anyone's interested, the net's
still there)
> but apparently someone (NOT ME!!) complained to the FCC, he got a letter
> from Riley and he took it down. This all happened last year, and it was a
fairly
> good idea, local ops on UHF h/t's could get in on the weekly net, but
apparently
> some folks thought it was not such a good idea.
>
>   So yeah, it's still done out there. Shame on the repeater coordinators
that let
> something like that slide by.
>
>                 _Ray_        KB�STN
>                 KB�STN / R, EM27, 53.25 out / 51.55 in :-)
>

 P.S.
 I inadvertently replied to an individual a bit earlier.
 this is because this email group does not reply to the one group when I hit
reply, but to the individual who made the post I was replying to.
 This is not a good way to have these groups set up IMO.