[1000mp] 1000-Field Review ... Notice what's MISSING?

[Billy Cox]

>>The ARRL had stated they were moving from the 20 kHz to the
>>more useful (and accurate) 5 kHz spacing measurements ...
>
>The numbers are there.

Not full use of them ... they even noted that they used the 20 kHz unless
otherwise stated at the bottom of the chart. 

I understand this will now be updated with the web data and corrected
prior to the actual QST printing.

And for that I say ... THANK YOU ... Way to go ARRL ! 

For where they listed the two sets of numbers (20 kHz and 5 kHz) it 
really shows how the closer measurements can define what is or is 
not a 'good receiver'.  Which is what many of us had asked for.

Look at ALL the "numbers" found in the text, are 20 kHz data, 
NOT 5 kHz, but again ... this is going to be revised ASAP. 

Again TU to those at HQ who have taken the steps to ensure
this form of information is both valid and accurate for our usage.

73 Billy AA4NU