[1000mp] 1000-Field Review ... Notice what's MISSING?

Pete Smith [email protected]
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:32:31 -0400


At 01:35 PM 6/27/02 -0500, AA4NU wrote:
>Anyone else notice that the receiver 5 kHz spacing tests are
>indeed MISSING from the QST review ?
>
>The 5 kHz spacing dynamic range or third order intercept
>numbers tend to show the more critical performance of the
>receiver under heavy QRM conditions ... Yet where are the
>measurements ?
>
>The ARRL had stated they were moving from the 20 kHz to the
>more useful (and accurate) 5 kHz spacing measurements ...
>
>So "where's the beef" ?

The numbers are there.


73, Pete N4ZR

Check out the World HF
Contest Station Database at
www.pvrc.org