[Yaesu] VHF/UHF mobile FTM-100D : RS-232 computer-control protocol ?

[Mike Olbrisch]

I was thinking the same thing.  If the Yaesu XYZ-1234 doesn't do what you
want it to do, complaining about it on the reflector isn't going to change
it, and likely isn't going to influence Yaesu to change the XYZ-1234 to fit
your needs.

There are a number of radios out there that can be run on computer control.
It would be more productive to look for what you need.  If not Yaesu, then
Kenwood, Icom, Elecraft, or several of the Chinese start-ups.

Vy73 - Mike - KD5KC.
El Paso, Texas - DM61rt.
W5-SOTA Association Manager.
NA-SOTA info: http://na-sota.org/




-----Original Message-----
From: Yaesu [mailto:yaesu-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of frank
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 03:55
To: Toussaint OTTAVI
Cc: yaesu at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Yaesu] VHF/UHF mobile FTM-100D : RS-232 computer-control
protocol ?

I find this is an interesting discussion.  Several viewpoints are offered.
Here is my solution to this very serious problem.

If the rig being considered does not meet your needs with regard to features
and price, don't buy it.

Find one that does meet your needs.

On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:59:50 +0100
Toussaint OTTAVI <t.ottavi at bc-109.com> wrote:

> Hi Scott,
> 
> Thank you for your answer.
> 
> Le 10/02/2016 19:27, KB0NLY a écrit :
> >
> > I would say your probably in the very small minority of people that 
> > would want CAT on a dual band mobile, not that I totally disagree with 
> > you, but if it meant increasing the price of the radio to add that 
> > feature I would vote to leave it out as these radios already have a 
> > significant amount of stuff built in! 
> 
> I fully agree with you : I'm probably in a very small minority ;-)
> 
> Moreover, here's my opinion. Modern TRX have hundreds of functions and 
> memories. Having to learn how to configure them through the limited user 
> interface (a rotary knob, some buttons, and a tiny screen), and doing 
> that by hand, is, in my opinion, pretty stupid in 2016 ! I'd like to do 
> all that on my 24" wide screen at home, or on my 8" Android tablet and 
> my Raspberry Pi in my car.
> 
> Also, TRX built for "mobile" operations are often used in several other 
> situations than a car, due to their tiny package and versatility. Here 
> are some examples of things I already did with "mobiles" :
> - a VHF/UHF FM base, at home
> - an interconnected repeater system over all my island
> - an automated system for remote control
> - a mixed usage (ham radio and professional 150 MHz radio)
> - a multipurpose radio in an helicopter
> 
> I agree with you about the additional cost of multiple features 
> everybody do not necessarly need. Here again, I think equipment 
> manufacturers should update their skills and technologies to the 21th 
> century ;-) Nowadays, most of the "advanced" features are only software. 
> In the same way we can buy "hardware" options (additional MIC, 
> speakers...), it would be interesting to be able to buy "software" 
> options : Fusion, APRS, GPS, computer-control, etc...
> 
> Then, for my particular needs, I wouldn't buy the "fusion" or "GPS" 
> options, but I would definitely buy the "computer-control" !
> 
> 73 de TK1BI
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Yaesu mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Yaesu at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


-- 
73,  Frank

______________________________________________________________
Yaesu mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Yaesu at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html