[Yaesu] It looks like BPL is being offered in Manassas, VA
[email protected]
[email protected]
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:13:45 -0400
Pete Markavage wrote:
> ARRL has been very proactive over this issue.
I've been a long time critic of the ARRL but I have to say they seem
to have done the right thing on this one. They haven't had much
effect because this is the Bush administration -- "if it can be strip
mined at a profit, go for it," regardless of the law.
The astonishing thing to me is that there's not a ripple yet on the
placid pond of ham radio. Looks to me like if your neighbors get this
service, you're out of HF ham radio, period. Yet in maybe four hours
average daily listening on 80-40-20, I have yet to hear the topic
mentioned. We get all hot about changes in license requirements or
the possible loss of a smidgeon of spectrum but the planned sinking
of the whole ship doesn't seem to bother us.
I don't think we should plan on commercial and military services
carrying our water on this one. My guess is it's gonna be a lot
worse for folks with an urban power line (serving many BPL users)
located near their antenna and that's not typical for the big boys.
I look for this to get really ugly and the further it goes before it's
beaten, the uglier it will be. Right now the money involved is all 'by
and by', but if a bunch of these systems get going, it'll be quadjillion
dollar lawsuits in every direction. Businesses formed to make
money from an innovation cannot back down, the FCC has no
incentive to -- indeed, the incentives for them are evidently to press
ahead. (Chairman Powell's post-FCC career plans probably would
give us the tip-off.) That leaves the Congress and the courts.
Courts generally defer to regulatory agencies.
Enterprising (surely there's a more precise word, but I can't think of
it) hams doubtless will explore countermeasures ... I suppose even a
small transceiver loaded up on the power lines would have some
effect on neighborhood modems. A series-tuned circuit in one or
more outlets might help the situation on one band at some expense
to signal levels at local modems. I don't see that being good for the
hobby. As I say, very, *very* messy. Let's hope the thing can be
strangled at an early stage.
I wouldn't have thought this idea was even worth exploring -- carrier
current systems have been around from before WW-II and never
amounted to much. I guess that digital techniques boost the s/n
enough to make it workable.
Walt Hutchens
KJ4KV