[Wswss] [VHFcontesting] The Real Reason the "NO .52" rule exists &something to ponder...

[Todd Evans]

That's an interesting idea Jack. Years ago I built my first EME station, it was challenging, fun and very gratifying to make improvements that I could actually hear. A little here, a little there meant more stations heard and worked.
 
Todd W6TOD DM15cq California

--- On Mon, 4/30/12, Jack/W6NF <vhfplus at gmail.com> wrote:


From: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Wswss] [VHFcontesting] The Real Reason the "NO .52" rule exists &something to ponder...
To: wswss at mailman.qth.net
Date: Monday, April 30, 2012, 10:27 AM


On 4/29/2012 5:52 AM, Steve Tripp (K1IIG) wrote:
>   I agree with the NO 52 rule and agree the rules in general are not changing
> for the better. For example, who came up with "distance scoring"? It appears
> to give the mountain topper a huge advantage over us struggling mediocre
> contesters. Let's go back to grid square and multiplier scoring.
>
> 73's Steve
> K1IIG
>
>
>
The distance multiplier is also an incentive for the home station owner 
to maximize the capability of their station, whether it be upgraded 
equipment and antennas or implementing new modes of operation (CW, 
FSK441, etc). It's certainly not just the mountain-topper who can take 
advantage of the scoring method.

It would be interesting for contest sponsors to include a "most improved 
score" award as further incentive to not only upgrade systems and 
technique but to encourage continued participation. There may be such an 
award somewhere but if there is I am unaware of it.

73,

-- 
Jack, W6NF
Silver Springs, NV
DM09ji

______________________________________________________________
Wswss mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/wswss
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Wswss at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html