[W3GV] Results of North American QSO Party CW 1/11/14
WW3S
ww3s at zoominternet.net
Sun Jan 12 17:02:07 EST 2014
N1MM wont cost you a dime, other than the time to download it....it is a great general logger also, however, it wont do things like QSL tracking, DXCC or other awards, etc.....it does allow you to export those contacts in an ADIF file, which I’m sure FJP can import....EQF was my first software, on a 5 1/4 floppy and running on an 8088 !!!! I knew Tom and in the DOS world, his software was about as good as it gets...Win-EQF though really isnt Windows software (unless the new developer changed something).....last I knew it was still basically the DOS version ported over to run in a Windows type box.....still a lot of users, and still being sold, but theres are lot more choices now, more suited to a “modern” PC.....
On 1/12/2014 3:13:08 PM, zipperkng at aol.com wrote:
> Sorry crahill...
> Don't know ur name.
>
> The TS-2000 will only be used, I would guess, 5-10% of the time for
> contesting. It is the main rig, hooked up to a possible 1500 watts and a tri band
> yagi .I have also used N1MM software and find it very good, but John,
> WB3IFD, has already purchased the CD with all the programs from N3FJP. We have
> been using the General Logging Program for several weeks now. I, as
> Contesting Chairman, am just giving my opinion as such. I would not be opposed to
> switching to another logging system if the membership wants to, and would
> fully support any change .I do not thing it is wise to have several different
> logging programs from different sources used at the club. It will lead to
> problems sending in logs when we do multi-station contesting, and we will
> possibly not have one consistent log on the TS-2000 station, but possibly
> many, that will make it very difficult, if not impossible, to mesh into one
> concise and accurate log for the entire W3GV call sign. Of course, if anyone
> wants to operate with their own call sign, they can use any logging
> program they want (paper or otherwise or none).
>
> I totally agree with you regarding the Laptop and Rigblaster. Both merit
> consideration by the Memb
More information about the W3GV
mailing list