[W2CRA] W2CRA Digest, Vol 76, Issue 3

[Art Greenberg]

Understood, but I don't think that is his question. It looks to me like 
he's interested in a dialog about what benefits can be had by linking via 
VoIP (as distinct from RF or hard wired links). I asked him if he had some 
business interest in VoIP, he replied that he has none.

I wonder if he's aware of EchoLink.

On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, William Powell wrote:

> No.
> Linking is NOT in the cards for CRA.
> ??  See me offline.
> Bp
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "w2cra-request at mailman.qth.net" <w2cra-request at mailman.qth.net>
> To: w2cra at mailman.qth.net
> Sent: Thu, July 8, 2010 12:00:45 PM
> Subject: W2CRA Digest, Vol 76, Issue 3
>
> Send W2CRA mailing list submissions to
>     w2cra at mailman.qth.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>     http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/w2cra
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>     w2cra-request at mailman.qth.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>     w2cra-owner at mailman.qth.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of W2CRA digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. What would make linked-repeater-networks better within the
>       Amateur Service? (fwd) (Art Greenberg)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:39:36 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
> From: Art Greenberg <artg at eclipse.net>
> Subject: [W2CRA] What would make linked-repeater-networks better
>     within the Amateur Service? (fwd)
> To: w2cra mailing list <w2cra at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.01.1007081128220.2556 at jo>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> Just received ...
>
> Does anyone care to respond to Mr. Elkin on behalf of CRA?
>
> I wonder if he has a business interest in VoIP systems. A quick check of
> "www.webetize.com" reveals:
>
> -  A post related to software development and deployment methodologies (c)
> 2004.  Old hat by now.
>
> - A post having to do with the Sun Microsystems - Microsoft "dispute" also
> (c) 2004. That's long enough ago that I don't recall the dispute referred
> to.
>
>

-- 
Art Greenberg
artg at eclipse.net