[W2CRA] W2CRA Digest, Vol 76, Issue 3

[William Powell]

No.
Linking is NOT in the cards for CRA.
??  See me offline.
Bp




________________________________
From: "w2cra-request at mailman.qth.net" <w2cra-request at mailman.qth.net>
To: w2cra at mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thu, July 8, 2010 12:00:45 PM
Subject: W2CRA Digest, Vol 76, Issue 3

Send W2CRA mailing list submissions to
    w2cra at mailman.qth.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/w2cra
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    w2cra-request at mailman.qth.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
    w2cra-owner at mailman.qth.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of W2CRA digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. What would make linked-repeater-networks better within the
      Amateur Service? (fwd) (Art Greenberg)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:39:36 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
From: Art Greenberg <artg at eclipse.net>
Subject: [W2CRA] What would make linked-repeater-networks better
    within the Amateur Service? (fwd)
To: w2cra mailing list <w2cra at mailman.qth.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.01.1007081128220.2556 at jo>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

Just received ...

Does anyone care to respond to Mr. Elkin on behalf of CRA?

I wonder if he has a business interest in VoIP systems. A quick check of 
"www.webetize.com" reveals:

-  A post related to software development and deployment methodologies (c) 
2004.  Old hat by now.

- A post having to do with the Sun Microsystems - Microsoft "dispute" also 
(c) 2004. That's long enough ago that I don't recall the dispute referred 
to.

-- 
Art Greenberg
artg at eclipse.net

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:07:50 -0400
From: Keith <keith at Webetize.com>
To: WebmasterW2CRA at gmail.com
Subject: What would make linked-repeater-networks better within the Amateur
    Service?

Cherryville Repeater Association

What would make linked-repeater-networks better within the Amateur Service?

If I understand it correctly the ARRL sees lone repeaters the same as 
linked-repeater-networks. I strongly disagree with such a statement and would 
like to hear from the linked-repeater-network community on the subject. VoIP is 
changing the telephone network at a rapid pace and I believe that VoIP is 
changing the Amateur Service. I would like to see that VoIP continues in the 
same Amateur tradition of a  unique and wonderful openness that encourages 
invention and comradery.

If you have any comments on the use of VoIP and linked-repeater-networks and 
what would make their use better within the Amateur Service, I appreciate 
hearing from you.

Respectfully,

Keith Elkin KB3TCB

http://www.qsl.net/w2cra/





------------------------------

_______________________________________________
W2CRA mailing list
W2CRA at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/w2cra


End of W2CRA Digest, Vol 76, Issue 3
************************************