[Vintage-Audio] Re IHF Rating System

Robert J. McKee mckee137 at mindspring.com
Tue Jun 15 01:19:29 EDT 2004


Smoke and mirrors, Duane, smoke and mirrors.

BTW, the RMS system was first.  THen the
IHF system came along to make the mid-fi
and consoles look good.  And of course the
legit dealers selling real hi-fi had to explain
to potential customers the effect of smoke
and mirrors raising the numbers to sucker
in some more business.

Bob McKee


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Duane Fischer, W8DBF " <dfischer at usol.com>
To: <vintage-audio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 4:30 PM
Subject: [Vintage-Audio] Re IHF Rating System


>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Once upon a time, there was a power rating system known as
the Institute of High
> Fidelity, or IHF. This was at a time when manufacturers
tried to suck in the
> public with 'peak' power ratings. "Handles 200 watts!" Yea,
but for 250
> milliseconds before the amplifier exploded! Shortly
thereafter the IHF rating
> appeard, I think? Then we went to the continuous RMS scale,
which was more
> accurate, or so they made us think anyhow.
>
> Does anyone recall what the IHF rating was actually based
upon?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Duane W8DBF
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/vintage-audio
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **



More information about the Vintage-Audio mailing list