[Vintage-Audio] Digital? He he he he he he....

Tue Aug 20 11:37:00 2002

Studios, like the rest of the world, were lied to.  They were
told it was
perfect audio perfect forever with no change when copied
generation
to generation.  Studios are going back to analog.  True it is
not for
the complete chain, but they recognize the digital
shortcomings.

----- Original Message -----
From: Duane Fischer, W8DBF <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Vintage-Audio] Digital? He he he he he he....

> I guess I must be among the unknowing, as it sure sounds
nice. If it is so
> crude, then why do studios use them? These machines were nto
cheap when I
> purchased them several years back.
>
>
> ----------
> From: Robert  J.  McKee <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Vintage-Audio] Digital?   He he he he he he....
> Date: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:24 AM
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Duane Fischer, W8DBF <[email protected]>
> <snip>
> >
> > While the Crown is an excellent recorder and playback
unit,
> I have serious
> > doubts it can equal a good quality DAT machine.
> >
> Duane, guess you are among the unknowing, sorry but true.
> DAT is not a high fidelity medium by any stretch of the
> imagination.  As a matter of fact it is one of the crude
> connect-the-dots digital devices.  If one wished "good"
> quality digital it is in the tens of thousands of dollars
> and still a hair short of analog.
>
> Bob McKee
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/vintage-audio
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: [email protected] **
> _______________________________________________
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/vintage-audio
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: [email protected] **