[TxHam] Recall of the North Texas SM

[Ben - ne5B]

I don't know any of you personally, but this sure sounds like more mud 
slinging starting all over again now that the Lawsuit has been settled and 
the Texas VHF FM Society http://www.txvhffm.org/  has been cleared in court.

Is http://www.txfca.org/ the Club that Blackwell wouldn't visit ?
Has he visited other clubs ???

Who authorized TXFCA to perform Frequency coordination in Texas?????
Everything I see and hear Texas VHF Society still has the job.

This is supposed to be a hobby, hobbies are supposed to be fun!
Come on people grow up and learn to get along!

73 Ben - ne5B


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jay Maynard" <jmaynard at conmicro.cx>
To: <txham at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [TxHam] Recall of the North Texas SM


> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 03:38:01PM -0500, Jay Urish wrote:
>> I have several reasons and I would like to stress that these are my
>> opinions only.
>
> Wow. Specifics.
>
>> 1. Lack of local services: I have asked Blackwell Several times to visit
>> my club and bring us up to speed on section affairs. Each time he has
>> been "too busy".
>
> I can't comment on this one way or the other.
>
>> 2. The way he ran his election campaign based on outright LIES and
>> innuendo's really torqued me off.
>
> Perhaps. Considering the campaign you have waged against others, though,
> you're in no positon to complain.
>
>> 3. Blackwell is involved with a small group of hams who are heavily
>> suspected of being directly responsible for several statewide acts of
>> repeater terrorism. Within days of the lawsuit against the TXVHF-FM
>> Society concluding, several of the Plaintiffs in the suit who had high
>> value commercial repeater sites across Texas, got booted from their
>> sites. This was not a coincidence.
>
> I don't know the facts related to this allegation. I will, however, point
> out that actions have consequences, and filing a bogus lawsuit to try to
> force through a result that would not have otherwise been the decision of
> the members of the Society - and, in the process, costing thousands of
> dollars in legal expenses - is going to get people angry at those who did
> that.
>
> If I were a tower owner, I would not wish to have a customer who was known
> to file frivolous and meritless lawsuits.
>
>> There is an interesting pdf document making the rounds through the
>> state.. It echo's a few of my concerns and brings out several I didn't
>> even know about.
>
> It hasn't landed in my mailbox yet. Perhaps the same spammer who sent one
> out just before the FM Society meeting last August will grace me with his
> presence again.
>
>> I ask whoever sees this document to do their own research. Make phone
>> calls, knock on doors, ASK QUESTIONS.. Please don't just take my word
>> for this.
>
> If, as I suspect, it's yet another smear campaign against Armadillo, 
> there's
> little point. If it's another smear campaign against me like the one
> conducted on the Texas_VHF_FM_Society mailing list, there's even less 
> point.
> -- 
> Jay Maynard, K5ZC                    http://www.conmicro.cx
> http://jmaynard.livejournal.com      http://www.tronguy.net
> http://www.hercules-390.org               (Yes, that's me!)
> Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390
> _______________________________________________
> TxHam mailing list
> TxHam at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/txham
>
>