[TrunkCom] possible mygration to LTR or some other kind of trunking and have questions about I-call monitoring with LTR

Jeff Kenyon jkenyon7 at rochester.rr.com
Mon Jun 14 20:21:48 EDT 2010


My thing is with LTR and monitoring it with a lot of different groups I've 
had trouble programming in specific TGs with the 250D because it isn't like 
with Moto or EDACS in terms of just going to the list of channels for TGs. 
I am monitoring it now and it sure is sparse compared to what it has been in 
the past, so I think that in the course of the next few days I'm going to 
hunt after some talkgroups on the LTR systems here and see what I come up 
with.  I don't particularly care for using this service, but that's a whole 
different story, but I find monitoring them sure helps!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <dmccorm at charter.net>
To: "Discussion of Monitoring Trunk Radio Systems" 
<trunkcom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 8:15 PM
Subject: Re: [TrunkCom] possible mygration to LTR or some other kind of 
trunking and have questions about I-call monitoring with LTR


> If the bus system uses groups or zones, you could see different PL, but I 
> doubt it.
>
> Mainly because regular LTR never needed I-Calls, you just create a new 
> talkgroup for talk-around or a phone patch.
>
> Regular LTR is the easiest of the trunked systems to monitor.
>
> ---- Jeff Kenyon <jkenyon7 at rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>> Would I still have the same PL tone if there  is MDC for signaling
>> individual radios?  As I said there isn't even LTR Passport here, but 
>> just
>> regular old LTR, and these LTR systems are either all on VHF or UHF.  For
>> all the time I've been here 800 MHz has been pretty dead, with a few
>> exceptions.
>>     I wonder why then there are no I-calls on LTR systems?  Also, 
>> generally
>> speaking the LTR systems have done  real well when competing with Nextel,
>> and there are always a lot of them no matter where you look no
>> radioreference.com
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: <dmccorm at charter.net>
>> To: "Discussion of Monitoring Trunk Radio Systems"
>> <trunkcom at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 8:04 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TrunkCom] possible mygration to LTR or some other kind of
>> trunking and have questions about I-call monitoring with LTR
>>
>>
>> > There are no I-Calls on LTR, however you could hear phone patch. This
>> > could be what they use. As long as it's regular LTR you can hear it.
>> >
>> > Also MDC1200 will support unit ID. So this could also be used on a
>> > conventional system.
>> >
>> > ---- Jeff Kenyon <jkenyon7 at rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi everyone, I have a weird suspicion that out local paratransit 
>> >> service
>> >> here in Rochester, NY may be moving to a trunked system some time in 
>> >> the
>> >> future if they haven't already done so.  Unless the bus company goes 
>> >> out
>> >> and purchases a trunked system there is no other trunking system they
>> >> could go on around here except for the few SMR  owners who have LTR
>> >> systems.  IN talking to some people they are trying o put together a 
>> >> new
>> >> radio system where it is just able to be bus to dispatcher and not bus 
>> >> to
>> >> bus and when the dispatcher wants to call a particular bus they'd have 
>> >> to
>> >> key in the ID for the given bus.  I haven't noticed any changes yet, 
>> >> but
>> >> trunking is not out of the question right now, and the only thing I'm
>> >> noticing on the conventional freq is that there is less traffic on it
>> >> then there normally is.  What I'm wondering though is can one listen 
>> >> to
>> >> I-calls on an LTR trunked system with the BC-250D?  I know you can do 
>> >> so
>> >> with Moto or EDACS, and one of the reasons I am hold
>> > ing onto my 250 is for trunktracking LTR systems when I have the 
>> > chance.
>> > If this service is moving to any of the LTR systems that are all 
>> > standard
>> > I'm going to be particularly interested in monitoring them be it a 
>> > regular
>> > TG or I-call.
>> > ______________________________________________________________
>> > TrunkCom mailing list
>> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>> >
>> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2928 - Release Date: 06/09/10
>> 18:35:00
> ______________________________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2928 - Release Date: 06/09/10 
18:35:00
-------------- next part --------------

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2928 - Release Date: 06/09/10 18:35:00


More information about the TrunkCom mailing list