[TrunkCom] PSR500/600 scanners capable of tracking ESK systems?

[Jeff Kenyon]

I'm surprised then that they are tracking ESAK systems, wouldn't that
defeat the purpose?  What about ProVoice useage, will these systems be
going all ProVoice soon?





On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, James Richardson wrote:

> Lakewood, West Metro and Wheat Ridge in Colorado turned in on Thursday and
> my PSR-500 and 600's are working great.
>
> Denver is currently testing ESK scheduled to turn the switch July 3rd.
>
> Remember ESK is not encryption in the truest sense of the word.
>
> Jim< MNN-001
> Mountain NewsNet, Inc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: trunkcom-bounces+jimmnn=comcast.net at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:trunkcom-bounces+jimmnn=comcast.net at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
> Jeff Kenyon
> Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 4:09 PM
> To: blind-l at listserv.UARK.edu; trunkcom at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [TrunkCom] PSR500/600 scanners capable of tracking ESK systems?
>
> Hi everyone, I  was just reading around on radioreference.com that the
> PSR500 and 600 scanners are capable of decoding and tracking ESK systems?
> I thought ESK  were meant to not be able to be tracked?
> 	Also, what is the status of new EDACS systems coming out with ESK?
> I see Denver is testing ESK and that Lakewood has it, though from seeing
> Lakewood's  talkgroups they are mostly analogue?  Any more ESK  systems
> rumored to be coming?
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>