[TrunkCom] I was just wondering about http://tinyurl.com/3asgpv

[Jeff Kenyon]

THe same is true with our system in Michigan.  When it was first being
introduced they talked a lot about security.  Some locals on the system
have chosen to encrypt while others are in the clear, and the state and
federal encrypts some stuff.





On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, JETorres wrote:

> All systems nowadays are advertised as "secure". Our statewide system
> in Alaska is advertised as such but it still monitor-able with only
> *some* agencies encrypted. I think the "secure" they talk about it's
> more related to: less likely to be hacked, interfered with or to have
> unauthorized users with "rogue" radios and such. Gone are the days of
> people buying a cheap trunking radio on eBay and program it to
> monitor (and sometimes illegally transmit) on a system.
>
> I thought the system in question was already being monitored as we
> speak? You can also see on the database that there's already some
> confirmed talkgroups submitted.....
>
>
>
> On Oct 22, 2007, at 2:01 PM, Rev. Robert P. Chrysafis wrote:
>
> > it states right on the page that it will be secure voice, data, and
> > imaging. this leads me to beleive that no scanner will be able to
> > monitor it. i'd look for encrypted data channels on somethingn like
> > this as well. may nor be right now, but as real users hop on the
> > system you'll start seeing DoD grade encryption.
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>