[TrunkCom] JIWN

[JERRY NONE]

So how is it working in Michigan?  I know that there
is @ least one county that is OpenSky.

OpenSky?  Nice name.  NOT open to radio scanners.

--- Jeff Kenyon <at649 at tcnet.org> wrote:

> Well, if OpenSky gets licensed to other people that
> may be a reality.
> However, until it gets up and running and working
> that will be a long
> time.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, JERRY NONE wrote:
> 
> > And OpenSky. :-)
> >
> > --- "Arthur-Bryan E. Phelps" <aphelps at enter.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I hear you. Now I'd be happy just to have an
> > > affordable pro-voice scanner by
> > > 2008. Dreaming, huh!?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:
> > >
> trunkcom-bounces+aphelps=enter.net at mailman.qth.net
> > >
> >
>
[mailto:trunkcom-bounces+aphelps=enter.net at mailman.qth.net]
> > > On Behalf Of
> > > Jeff Kenyon
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:35 PM
> > > To: Discussion of Monitoring Trunk Radio Systems
> > > Subject: RE: [TrunkCom] JIWN
> > >
> > > I know how that goes.  It will be interesting to
> see
> > > what technology will
> > > exist radio or otherwise by that time.  I never
> > > thought as a kid when
> > > scanner monitoring and watching all them
> flashing
> > > lights going back and
> > > forth I'd be concerned with things like
> > > trunktracking and whether or not
> > > something can be monitored and things like that.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Arthur-Bryan E. Phelps
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I cannot really answer your question, Jeff.
> But
> > > your original post
> > > > referenced a possible effect on local LE
> entities.
> > > The answer to that
> > > > question is "most likely no". This is a
> federal
> > > initiative. Dave is
> > > > correct in his analysis of the architecture of
> > > such an endeavor.
> > > > Although government agencies are purchasing
> > > standard P25 systems and
> > > > pro-voice and whatever, I'm certain by 2021
> the
> > > technology available
> > > > will raise the bar on anything that exists
> today.
> > > Relax a bit. This is
> > > > government, remember. Nothing is carved in
> stone.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From:
> > >
> trunkcom-bounces+aphelps=enter.net at mailman.qth.net
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
[mailto:trunkcom-bounces+aphelps=enter.net at mailman.qth.net]
> > > On Behalf
> > > > Of Jeff Kenyon
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:15 PM
> > > > To: Discussion of Monitoring Trunk Radio
> Systems
> > > > Subject: Re: [TrunkCom] JIWN
> > > >
> > > > Hi Dave and the group.  What is the P-25 JIWN
> > > system on the west coast
> > > > in Oregon and Washington being used for then? 
> I
> > > had always wondered
> > > > when it would be expanded to the rest of the
> > > country.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, David T. Stark wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Hi everyone, I just saw another update on
> > > radioreference.com about
> > > > > > the JIWN trunked system, and I guess that
> by
> > > 2021 it will be a
> > > > > > nation wide trunked system.  Does anyone
> know
> > > if eventually state
> > > > > > and local governments will be joining the
> > > system, and what about
> > > > > > the federal government's switch to all
> > > ProVoice?  I had heard a
> > > > > > lot of different things saying that they
> will
> > > be going ProVoice
> > > > > > with regard to the federal government and
> > > another thing was
> > > > > > OpenSky and a few other
> > > > things like that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Referring to JIWN as a "nationwide" system
> is a
> > > misnomer.  Various
> > > > > standalone systems (both trunked and
> > > conventional) used by federal
> > > > > agencies and the military around the country
> are
> > > going to be "part of"
> > > > JIWN.
> > > > > However, this is not a single radio system
> in
> > > any way resembling,
> > > > > for example, a Motorola SmartZone system.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is likely going to be a way to link
> these
> > > individual systems
> > > > > together temporarily if some situation
> requires
> > > it, probably via IP
> > > > > at the
> > > > back end.
> > > > > In that sense, there is a potential to hook
> them
> > > all up and create a
> > > > > "nationwide" radio network, but in actual
> > > practice there is no
> > > > > reason for that to happen.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > David T. Stark
> > > > > M.A. Criminal Justice / ACJS / CJEANYS / ISI
> > > Adjunct Instructor of
> > > > > Criminal Justice, HVCC, Troy, NY ARES /
> RACES /
> > > Skywarn / QCWA NF2G
> > > > > /
> > > > > IBN-289 (ex-N2CSB, KYR-7128, KNY2DJ, RCMA
> > > NY-172, NYSING-01) FEMA
> > > > > certifications: IS-100, 200, 700, 800
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
______________________________________________________________
> > > > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > > > Home:
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > > > > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
______________________________________________________________
> > > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > > Home:
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > > > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
______________________________________________________________
> > > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > > Home:
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > > > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
______________________________________________________________
> > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > Home:
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> 
=== message truncated ===



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
It's here! Your new message!  
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/