[TrunkCom] JIWN

[Jeff Kenyon]

I doubt that will happen any time soon, and if and when a ProVoice scanner 
comes a long be prepared to pay up for one!  I'm just glad for now I don't 
have much around me with regard to ProVoice.  Consumer's Energy EDACS system 
would be the closest to me, and even there the ProVoice isn't used all that 
much.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Arthur-Bryan E. Phelps" <aphelps at enter.net>
To: "'Discussion of Monitoring Trunk Radio Systems'" 
<trunkcom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:57 PM
Subject: RE: [TrunkCom] JIWN


>I hear you. Now I'd be happy just to have an affordable pro-voice scanner 
>by
> 2008. Dreaming, huh!?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: trunkcom-bounces+aphelps=enter.net at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:trunkcom-bounces+aphelps=enter.net at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
> Jeff Kenyon
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:35 PM
> To: Discussion of Monitoring Trunk Radio Systems
> Subject: RE: [TrunkCom] JIWN
>
> I know how that goes.  It will be interesting to see what technology will
> exist radio or otherwise by that time.  I never thought as a kid when
> scanner monitoring and watching all them flashing lights going back and
> forth I'd be concerned with things like trunktracking and whether or not
> something can be monitored and things like that.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Arthur-Bryan E. Phelps wrote:
>
>> I cannot really answer your question, Jeff. But your original post
>> referenced a possible effect on local LE entities. The answer to that
>> question is "most likely no". This is a federal initiative. Dave is
>> correct in his analysis of the architecture of such an endeavor.
>> Although government agencies are purchasing standard P25 systems and
>> pro-voice and whatever, I'm certain by 2021 the technology available
>> will raise the bar on anything that exists today. Relax a bit. This is
>> government, remember. Nothing is carved in stone.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: trunkcom-bounces+aphelps=enter.net at mailman.qth.net
>> [mailto:trunkcom-bounces+aphelps=enter.net at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf
>> Of Jeff Kenyon
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:15 PM
>> To: Discussion of Monitoring Trunk Radio Systems
>> Subject: Re: [TrunkCom] JIWN
>>
>> Hi Dave and the group.  What is the P-25 JIWN system on the west coast
>> in Oregon and Washington being used for then?  I had always wondered
>> when it would be expanded to the rest of the country.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, David T. Stark wrote:
>>
>> > > Hi everyone, I just saw another update on radioreference.com about
>> > > the JIWN trunked system, and I guess that by 2021 it will be a
>> > > nation wide trunked system.  Does anyone know if eventually state
>> > > and local governments will be joining the system, and what about
>> > > the federal government's switch to all ProVoice?  I had heard a
>> > > lot of different things saying that they will be going ProVoice
>> > > with regard to the federal government and another thing was
>> > > OpenSky and a few other
>> things like that.
>> >
>> > Referring to JIWN as a "nationwide" system is a misnomer.  Various
>> > standalone systems (both trunked and conventional) used by federal
>> > agencies and the military around the country are going to be "part of"
>> JIWN.
>> > However, this is not a single radio system in any way resembling,
>> > for example, a Motorola SmartZone system.
>> >
>> > There is likely going to be a way to link these individual systems
>> > together temporarily if some situation requires it, probably via IP
>> > at the
>> back end.
>> > In that sense, there is a potential to hook them all up and create a
>> > "nationwide" radio network, but in actual practice there is no
>> > reason for that to happen.
>> >
>> >
>> > David T. Stark
>> > M.A. Criminal Justice / ACJS / CJEANYS / ISI Adjunct Instructor of
>> > Criminal Justice, HVCC, Troy, NY ARES / RACES / Skywarn / QCWA NF2G
>> > /
>> > IBN-289 (ex-N2CSB, KYR-7128, KNY2DJ, RCMA NY-172, NYSING-01) FEMA
>> > certifications: IS-100, 200, 700, 800
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________________________
>> > TrunkCom mailing list
>> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>> > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>> >
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> TrunkCom mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> TrunkCom mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net