[TrunkCom] band conditiona this last weekend

[Jeff Kenyon]

Well, 106 is close to the boarder.  Did you get 701, which is the CQPSK
Detroit cite?  How about a 3600 BAUD system with 801C?  Those toher 200
cites are more further from the boarder, but the 106 cite I wouldn't b e
too surprised about.  I didn't get the other cites in Michigan that are
CQPSK and the next nearest is in Flint.





On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Scott Berringer wrote:

> I had the usual ones that I get a lot. 206, 106, 207, 202, 204, 20D.
>
> The one that threw me off was 106 which is in Adrian, MI.
>
>
> Jeff Kenyon wrote:
>
> > I didn't try the ham bands, or hook my 96 up to another unit, but I have
> > to say, that this is the first Thanks Giving weekend that the bands are
> > like this.  What have others heard?  What MPSCS cites in Michigan did you
> > pick up?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Scott Berringer wrote:
> >
> >
> >>While out in the wee hours of the morning yesterday (Friday morning), I
> >>was out doing my paper route with my PRO-96 and stock duck antenna. I
> >>was able to pick up trunked system sites from Michigan, Ohio, Ontario,
> >>Canada, and even one site of the Indiana SAFE-T system from Pulaski County.
> >>
> >>Mind you, though, that I'm in Ashtabula County, Ohio (Extreme NE Ohio).
> >>
> >>While the PRO-96 was hooked up to my outdoor antenna, I was able to pick
> >>up several distant Ohio MARCS, Michigan MPSCS, Ontario, Canada Fleetnet
> >>sites. In addition, I even had 2 out of several known sites for the
> >>Toronto GO Transit system from Toronto Canada.
> >>
> >>
> >>Jeff Kenyon wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi everyone, I don't know if I posted this earlier that the conditions
> >>>last night were so good on UHF and 800 MHz that with the Pro-96 I was not
> >>>only locking onto distant MPSCS cites in Central Michigan, but both the
> >>>Ingham and Clinton County EDACS systems were coming in clear as a bell
> >>>last night, and the control channels for both EDACS systems on UHF for
> >>>Ingham and 800 MHz for Clinton were quickly detected.  I've never had luck
> >>>like this with either system, and I'm just wondering what the rest of you
> >>>have heard?  Both systems were tracked with the Pro-96 as I said with the
> >>>800 MHz RS Antenna.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>______________________________________________________________
> >>>TrunkCom mailing list
> >>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> >>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> >>>Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>______________________________________________________________
> >>TrunkCom mailing list
> >>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> >>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> >>Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> >>
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> >
> >
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>