[TrunkCom] systems that will be using and already are using CQPSK

Sun, 1 Feb 2004 05:27:28 -0600

Well, the Detroit system has gone from one delay after another, and I guess
I'll be setting a side money for the Pro-96 or BC296.  How does CQPSK work
with the 250D and 785D?  I heard that there were problems, and what is the
advantage of CQPSK?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike VanderVeer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [TrunkCom] systems that will be using and already are using
CQPSK


> Detroit, Macomb County, and Monroe county will be coming up with CQPSK
sites
> over the next year in Michigan.  I wouldn't be surprised if other areas do
> as well.
>
> Mike
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 6:59 PM
> Subject: [TrunkCom] systems that will be using and already are using CQPSK
>
>
> > Hi everyone.  I have been seeing on the list here a lot in regards to
the
> > Pro-96 and CQPSK, and what other systems are their besides Austin, Texas
> > that will be using this level with digital, and what systems plan on
using
> > it in the future?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > mailto:[email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom