[TrunkCom] Scanners on Airplanes

JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON [email protected]
Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:44:51 -0500 (EST)


I don't know, but that is a good question.  You were flying
internationally so that may have been a factor.  How about flying in the
states?  I will be flying from Michigan to Florida at the end of the
month.  Of course I am expecting delays, but plan on bringing not only my
scanner, but some ham and short- wave gear  as well a long with a lap top
computer.  I'm not going to have all of this in my carry on, but the items
I will most likely have on me in my carry on are my scanner and my HTS,
and a little SW receiver that only FM would work on a plain anyway.  
	Personally when I tried to trunktrack on a plain last year on
spring break I found it hard because for one my radio got confused with
the many control channels I could receive.  The other thing was that with
some type I systems that I had programmed into my scanner I would fly over
areas where there were type II systems thus creating a mix up in fleet
maps.  I know that on plains  I really should not be using a scanner or
radio, but its kind of hard to trunktrack, and that would pose a good
 question.





On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Milo - Sandburg wrote:

> The last week of Sep '01 I departed Houston enroute to Toronto with three
> (3) scanners in my carry on without any inspection other than the
> carry-on xray.  On my return from Vacouver, BC to Houston I was made to
> "disconnect the batteries and not reconnect them until I arrived in
> Houston".  This was done by one of the "screeners".  Of course, I did not
> reconnect them until I arrived in Houston. YEAH SURE!
> 
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 20:40:48 -0800 "Doris Dunham" <[email protected]>
> writes:
> > Has anyone tryed to carry radio scanners onto an airplane as "carry 
> > on"
> > items?  I know they cannot be used onboard, but I would like to know 
> > if they
> > will be allowed to be carried on after "9-11" and not need to be 
> > "checked"
> > as baggage.  Sorry if this is not "trunk" related, but it is an 
> > important
> > subject to all "scannests"......thanks
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > mailto:[email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>