[Trunkcom] MultiNet

Thu, 03 Jan 2002 19:23:22 -0600

Nope

"Delong, Mike (Dallas, CSC)" wrote:
> 
> Isn't the RS pro-92 multinet?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Williams [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:08 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Trunkcom] MultiNet
> 
> Who currently makes a multinet capable scanner?
> 
> Jerry Kacprzycki wrote:
> >
> > Lets just hope that scanner manufacturers keep LTR and LTR Multi-Net in future models.  There is tons of LTR activity in Northeast Ohio.  Alrighty, granted it is business users but it is there.
> >
> > >>> [email protected] 01/03/02 12:57AM >>>
> > On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 20:00:23 EST [email protected] writes:
> > > As I hear nothing current at this time.  Maybe an addition to the
> > > digital scanner in dec
> >
> > Doubtful.  Only a handful of agencies use Multi-Net.  And one of them,
> > Martin County, FL, is scraping theirs for a Motorola system.
> >
> > --
> >
> > The Scanner Dude
> > Brian J. Cathcart - KE4PMJ
> > South Florida Trunking Guide - 5th Edition (On CD-ROM too!)
> > Palm Beach County Frequency Directory - 4th Edition (On CD-ROM too!)
> > _______________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > mailto:[email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > mailto:[email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> _______________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom