[Trunkcom] Comparison of Pro-92, Pro-93 and Pro-94

Mon, 31 Dec 2001 08:57:43 -0500

The A and B model function the same, there should be no operational
difference.

Ken Roberts
[email protected]

----- Original Message -----
From: Jerry Kacprzycki <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Trunkcom] Comparison of Pro-92, Pro-93 and Pro-94

> Why would you recommend the " A " model versus the " B " model?
> I have the 20-522B and it works great.
>
> >>> [email protected] 12/28/01 12:41PM >>>
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 11:32:56 -0500 "Chris Pohlad-Thomas"
> <[email protected]> writes:
> > Of these three, which do you all think is best.  I currently have
> > the Pro-94, and was trying to help someone who is looking for a
> scanner.
> >  I think the reason why i bought the 94 over the 92 was price at the
> > time, but of these three which would you all recommend?
>
> You forgot one in your list - the Bearcat 245xlt.  That would be my
> choice.  But if you must stay with the Radio Shack branded models, and
> you want to do trunking, go with the PRO-94.  And if you do go with it,
> only get the "A" model (the "A" will be on the rear label behind the
> catalog number, i.e. 20-524A).
>
> --
>
> The Scanner Dude
> Brian J. Cathcart - KE4PMJ
> South Florida Trunking Guide - 5th Edition (On CD-ROM too!)
> Palm Beach County Frequency Directory - 4th Edition (On CD-ROM too!)
> _______________________________________________
> Trunkcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trunkcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>