[Trunkcom] Comparison of Pro-92, Pro-93 and Pro-94

Mon, 31 Dec 2001 08:14:01 -0500

Well, my 92B works great on the local E.D.A.C.S. TRs s in this area of the country.

>>> [email protected] 12/28/01 10:29PM >>>
When I purchased my Pro 94, I first bought the Pro 92.  I then found out that
the Pro 94 worked better for systems running EDACS.  So I guess it would depend
on what you want to scan.

Kirwin F. Kolb
[email protected] 

Chris Pohlad-Thomas wrote:

> Of these three, which do you all think is best.  I currently have the
> Pro-94, and was trying to help someone who is looking for a scanner.  I
> think the reason why i bought the 94 over the 92 was price at the time, but
> of these three which would you all recommend?
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trunkcom mailing list
> [email protected] 
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom 

_______________________________________________
Trunkcom mailing list
[email protected] 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom