[TheForge] Re: But how fast does the Alldays & Onions go?
ries
ries at riesniemi.com
Fri Jul 11 14:17:46 EDT 2008
On Jul 11, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Mike Spencer wrote:
And anyhow, I *like* futzing with old machinery. Someone posted here
(was it Ries, maybe?) slagging the old behemoth hammers and touting the
slick, highly engineered, modern ones. Quite right in terms of
efficiency, productivity, business acumen etc. But not nearly as much
fun for the up-front money.
Wasnt me- Specially because there are NO highly engineered, slick,
modern ones.
Well, there are those new utility air hammers, like Big Blu's, but
they are hardly slick. Slap an air cylinder on a welded frame- its not
exactly engineering.
The closest to a real "new" hammer in some time is John Larson's Iron
Kiss. Which is well thought out, but trys to look old on purpose.
I may have expressed a preference for good old 1920's style self
contained air hammers, as opposed to 1890's style mechanicals, but
thats about as far as I went.
The current crop of chinese self contained hammers from Anyang and
Stryker, while, new, are based almost exactly on pre second world war
chambersburg hammers.
Nothing modern about them.
There is one style of mechanism that I could see getting excited
about, though, as a modern hammer- problem is, nobody makes one yet.
Its the new japanese designed and made mechanical (as opposed to
hydraulic) presses, that are starting to be used for some stamping
processes.
These are high torque, low rpm, direct drive servo motors- no
flywheels, no hydraulic cylinders, no air cylinders. No cycling- they
hit when, and how, you tell em to, with programmable strokes.
They are just starting to revolutionise the stamping industry, but the
basic principle, while certainly not cheap, could be applied to forging.
http://www.aida-global.com/Metalforming-Solutions/servopro.cfm
Ries
Ries Niemi
Industrial Artist
http://www.riesniemi.com/
More information about the TheForge
mailing list