[TheForge] "Lug nut" torquing - order of tightening? OT
David E. Smucker
davesmucker at hotmail.com
Fri Apr 4 17:51:31 EST 2008
Physics is physics -- talk to them, they under stand order of torquing. (Or
if you did and they couldn't help -- well nothing ventured nothing gained.)
I have seen some of their units, it was 10 years ago that the bolt size was
about 3/8 -- not far from what you are looking at.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Freeman" <freemab222 at gmail.com>
To: "Sponsored by ABANA" <theforge at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [TheForge] "Lug nut" torquing - order of tightening? OT
> Great idea, but these bolts are much smaller than 1".
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:13 AM, David E. Smucker
> <davesmucker at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Bruce, Go to the following website, http://www.superbolt.com/
>>
>> Then call and talk to their application engineers. They should be able
>> to
>> give you real world experience. I have used their systems for real world
>> critical applications of heavy load applications. Good Folks.
>>
>> Dave Smucker
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Freeman"
>> <freemab222 at gmail.com>
>> To: "Sponsored by ABANA" <theforge at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 10:54 AM
>> Subject: [TheForge] "Lug nut" torquing - order of tightening? OT
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This relates to my earlier question of torquing SS bolts, but now I'm
>> > thinking in terms of order.
>> >
>> > The bolts are in two circles, tightening together a stack of disks.
>> > We want pressure uniform. To complicate matters there are twice as
>> > many bolts in the outer circle than in the inner, namely 36 vs 18.
>> > Number them by the inner bolts: 1, 2, 3, ..., 18 for the inner, 1',
>> > 1", 2', 2", 3', 3", ..., 18', 18" for the outer.
>> >
>> > For one time through, we snugged the bolts around the circles, then
>> > tightened: 1, `10, 1', 10', 1", 10"; then moved on to 2, 11, 2', 11',
>> > 2", 11", etc.
>> >
>> > Another time through we tightened, 1, 1', 1", 10, 10', 10"; then moved
>> > to 2, 2', 2", 11, 11', 11", etc.
>> >
>> > But later I got to thinking that this might not be ideal. For lug
>> > nuts, you tighten in a star pattern. I presume something similar
>> > would be better for this stack as well. But what offset? 180degrees
>> > then 90 degrees? or ~60 degrees?
>> >
>> > Any thoughts or wisdom to share?
>> >
>> > -
>> > Bruce
>> > NJ
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Manage membership or unsubscribe at:
>> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
>> > theforge mail list group photo site is
>> > http://www.photoaccess.com
>> > Login: blacksmithblacksmith at hotmail.com
>> > password: anvil
>> > ___________
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Manage membership or unsubscribe at:
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
>> theforge mail list group photo site is
>> http://www.photoaccess.com
>> Login: blacksmithblacksmith at hotmail.com
>> password: anvil
>> ___________
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bruce
> NJ
> _______________________________________________
> Manage membership or unsubscribe at:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
> theforge mail list group photo site is
> http://www.photoaccess.com
> Login: blacksmithblacksmith at hotmail.com
> password: anvil
> ___________
>
>
>
More information about the TheForge
mailing list