[TheForge] Gas Forge Recommendation
Peter Fels And Phoebe Palmer
artgawk at thegrid.net
Wed Jul 13 02:18:51 EDT 2005
This brings up yet another thing that leaves me even more confused...to
wit...
If one contaminates a torch or tig weld with oil or grease it gets ugly
usually....hard to get the weld to take......
Why isn't that the case with forge welding?....Pete F
Jerry Frost wrote:
> Dang! Just as I'm about to head off to Wi. to the first ever Artmetal
> Shindig a good thread comes up.
>
> There's some bit of myth involved in just what "welding" temp is.
> There're more factors than heat involved, clean being number two on the
> list. Get the metal clean and smooth enough and it doesn't take heat at
> all, of course this is VERY clean and mirror finished.
>
> I've seen a demo billet welded at barely bright red. The individual
> pieces were matched and polished, then lightly oiled. The stacked billet
> got a perimeter bead with a small gap to vent and a drop of 3in1 oil in
> the gap as it cooled for "flux". Heated and soaked at bright red a
> pattern of gentle raps, barely enough to hammer mark the surface, welded
> it solid.
>
> I've looked at some pics and drawings of chip forges and think there's
> some real promise, enough to try making one anyway. There isn't much
> volume of chips and the burner inlet isn't simple but it's not terribly
> complicated either.
>
> All the commercial models I've seen are gun burners and the way the
> burner feeds into the chips I have doubts a naturally aspirated burner
> will work. Gonna give it a try though.
>
> Gotta get the shop up first though.
>
> One last thought on chip forges and forge workshops. I would discourage
> a workshop till there was a proven working model to "copy". A workshop
> with a bunch of guys expecting to take a working forge home isn't the
> place to expreiment.
>
> Frosty
> ------------------------
> If it ain't forged
> it ain't real.
> Wrought iron is.
> The FrostWorks
>
> Meadow Lakes, AK.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <Keporter at aol.com>
> To: <theforge at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 11:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [TheForge] Gas Forge Recommendation
>
>
>>
>> In a message dated 7/9/2005 9:19:39 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
>> frosty at customcpu.com writes:
>>
>> One of the other factors to consider is forge displacement. A typical
>> 3/4"
>> burner is good in 300 cu/" and adequate for 350 cu/". A 3/4" jet ejector
>> type easily powers a 350 cu/" forge. I have my 1" burner poked into
>> about
>> 400 cu/" so it's no wonder it produces better than "average" heat.
>> Cheat?
>> Me? <grin>
>>
>> Frosty
>>
>>
>> Frosty
>> I think welding heat for many people involved in Damascus steel, etc. has
>> more to do with deliberately overheating in order to make sure that no
>> delaminating occurs, and of course, to speed up production time, than
>> it has to do
>> with typical blacksmithing operations, including upset welding. This
>> is fine
>> with me; equipment is strictly about getting results in my view.
>> However, I
>> think they are missing a bet by running tunnel forges at very high
>> heats to do
>> so.
>>
>> I believe that what they are trying to accomplish would be better done in
>> ceramic chip forges. With the use of such forges thermal mass could be
>> employed
>> to reduce heat loss as compared with rapid exchange of atmospheres (as
>> is the
>> case with tunnel forges run at high gas pressures). Also, the ceramic
>> chips
>> could absorb heat steadily from gas flames, and then release it
>> rapidly into
>> the work by conduction, thus operating with the kind of efficiency
>> boost seen
>> in hybrid electric cars, where a small gasoline motor feeds a series of
>> batteries, which quickly release larger amounts of energy when needed,
>> rather
>> than running a large motor all the time.
>>
>> Five years ago, my concern was getting the most performance and the most
>> flexibility out of small forge designs. Back then, being able to run a
>> day's
>> production from one twenty pound propane tank looked like a hobbyist's
>> dream
>> come true. However, looking to the future of crafts in the light of
>> escalating
>> fuel prices, I believe that efficiency will become a an ever more
>> critical
>> issue. These days, I'm looking at industrial cost cutting methods cut
>> down to a
>> hobby scale; not that they are needed yet, but in another five years who
>> knows? That isn't too long a time period for designing downdraft
>> forges, etc.
>> Mike P.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Manage membership or unsubscribe at:
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
>> theforge mail list group photo site is
>> http://www.photoaccess.com
>> Login: blacksmithblacksmith at hotmail.com
>> password: anvil
>> ___________
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Manage membership or unsubscribe at:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
> theforge mail list group photo site is
> http://www.photoaccess.com
> Login: blacksmithblacksmith at hotmail.com
> password: anvil
> ___________
>
>
>
>
More information about the TheForge
mailing list