[TheForge] Roger Duncan
Andy Vida
[email protected]
Mon Mar 22 16:33:01 2004
[email protected] wrote:
> I have seen the same phenomenon with my fathers family. Fifteen
> siblings, with a couple dying of cancer in their 40's the rest all
> living into their nineties. I think the advantage some of these people
> had was growing up in the country and having their lungs develop without
> being bombarded from birth with toxins, so they had better organs to
> start with. I.E it worked for them but isn't likely to work for you.
This I can believe. They also lived a far more physical life
and IMO their diets were far better. The doofus diet experts
notwithstanding, I think the diets that send them into grandmal
seizures were actually very healthy. Grandma didn't eat any of
that processed crap. I remember summers in Europe, every Wed.
the diary lady came by, a somewhat overweight hobbled woman,
perhaps in her 60s. She always had absolutely fresh cottage
cheese and sour cream. I have to confess that I miss these
things. They taste SO different from anything you will ever
get from a US dairy. No processing other than the old fashioned
methods for producing the various items. I suspect that much
of the lousy health of people these days can be directly
attributed to the extremely poor quality of the food. It LOOKS
good and, if you're used to it, tastes good, but it doesn't
necessarily follow that it is nutritionally sound, and much of
it has been clearly demonstrated to be of less than zero value.
But I think being physically active is also important. Look at
Marshall. Early 50s, skinny as a rail, eats all manner of
absolute CRAP (Little Debbie maintains stock value based on his
sales) and yet he's strong as hell, trim, in good shape and
seems to be in excellent health. He is a farmer and is always
working at significantly physical things. I think this is
very different from the yuppie that does his two hours of working
out four days or even seven days a week. I can't prove it, but
I suspect it to be the case.
>
> The problem is we are not a nation of adults, we are a nation of
> adolocents who make big talk about how we are capable of running our
> lives,
Well said. I absolutely agree with you. I look at the ways
in which my grandparents' generation ran their lives. No
comparison can be made with our generation, who are generally
very childish.
> but when put to the test repeatedly look for someone to blame and
> make it all right for us.
this is surely common enough to be non-arguable.
> Eat yourself into a spot where you can't get
> out of bed, you are disabled and collect money,
But... but... butt... it's not thier fault. Mommy didn't
potty train Johnny properly or rejected him. It's all that
bitch's fault... or dad's... sis, bro... aunt touched his
wee wee... anyone but him. Sheesh Charles, don't you
know ANYTHING?
> Smoke yourself to death and then sue the tobacco companies.
That's the one that really gets me. Those guys were up
to no good, that is for certain, especially in their
targeting campaigns for children, but I don't believe
there is an adult on the planet that cannot pretty well
figure that the activity is dangerous. Anyone that can't
isn't intelligent enough to be loose on the streets and
should be rounded up and take to some sort of group home
to be cared for.
> Stand in line at the local hardware store and listen
> to people bitch about outsourcing and jobs going over seas while the
> cashier rings up their collection of chinese tools that they picked
> instead of the "over priced" American ones.
What's that old saying about money talking and something
walking?
> Of course we want everyone
> else to buy american, just not us. And these are people that make
> three, four and five times the national average, and think they are
> being put upon. So we are not a nation of adults, we are a nation of
> adolescents.
I was going to say idiot children.