[TenTec] [Ten-Tec-Omni-VII] TEN-TEC NETS TODAY (SUNDAY)

[James C. Owen, III]

Hi Dave,
   I'm a little confused on your comment on the OMNI VII. I don't understand what you mean that there is no independent control for VFO B.  B can be controlled just a A as far as frequency goes.  I love my Omni VII as it's the best I have had in my 55 years and I have had quite a few Ten-Tec's as well as others.
73 Jim K4CGY




________________________________
 From: David Thompson <thompson at mindspring.com>
To: David Blake <dhblake at yahoo.com>; Discussion of Tentec equipment <tentec at mailman.qth.net> 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Ten-Tec-Omni-VII] TEN-TEC NETS TODAY (SUNDAY)
 

David,

I am on the ten tec reflector at contesting.com and agree the ten tec net 
stuff is over running all the reflectors.  I ahve no interest in the nets or 
certificates
and do not approve of ten tec using the nets to market their gear.

I have has several ten tec pieces of gear starting with the Triton IV and on 
my third 229 tuner.  My interest now is expanding to 6 meters and digital 
(psk and real FSK rtty.  This leaves out the Orions but when you made your 
post I pulled out the Omni VII review in the 2007 QST.

Reading the review I am still lukewarm on the Omni VII.  6 meters is a plus 
and it appears the VII handles digital OK.  My pet peave with the middle of 
the road gear is that there is no independent control for VFO B.  At least 
the VII shows the frequency of VFO B.  I hate SSB voive equalizers, too.

73 Dave K4JRB 


______________________________________________________________
Tentec mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/tentec
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Tentec at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html