[Spooks] HAM Stuff [was: Re: Lincolnshire poacher]
Martin G Choquette
mactatio at gmail.com
Mon Oct 7 16:10:22 EDT 2013
Nobody mentioned it but the WebSDR net works well, especially the
Netherlands radio...and it's all free, google it.
On 2013-10-07 3:58 PM, "john" <johnmb at nc.rr.com> wrote:
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from
this list
Sure!
www.eham.net has a lot of them!
( it's a ham site ) :-)
John
At 03:38 PM 10/7/2013, you wrote:
> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/spooks<http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks>to unsubscribe from this list Thank you for the information. This is a lot
> more involved than I would have thought. Do you know of any good web sites
> or other resources that give reviews for radios and antennas (and any other
> important items that would go along with them)? I don't think I'll be able
> to afford any major purchases until the government decides to let me go
> back to work *growl* but I can at least take some time to read up on the
> subject. On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote: > Visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/spooks<http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks>to unsubscribe from this list > > Hi Parrish: > > The antenna is just as
> important as the radio. > For receive applications the T2FD is hard to beat
> (and also for many transmit applications). >
> http://www.prc68.com/I/RCS-5A.**shtml#T2FD<http://www.prc68.com/I/RCS-5A.shtml#T2FD>> I claim that using a chirp receiver is the best way to evaluate a receive
> antenna. > > A key radio specification is the IF bandwidth, the narrower
> the better for detecting a signal. > Of course the IF needs to be as wide
> as the signal to hear the modulation. > For example the HP 4395A spectrum
> analyzer has a true 1Hz RBW, it's my most sensitive instrument. >
> http://www.prc68.com/I/4395A.**shtml#SA<http://www.prc68.com/I/4395A.shtml#SA>> > The NRD545 has a 10 Hz IF BW, which is the narrowest receiver I have. >
> http://www.prc68.com/I/NRD545.**shtml<http://www.prc68.com/I/NRD545.shtml>> > > Have Fun, > > Brooke Clarke, N6GCE >
> http://www.PRC68.com > http://www.**end2partygovernment.com/**
> 2012Issues.html <http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html> > >
> Parrish S. Knight wrote: >> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/**
> mailman/listinfo/spooks <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks>to unsubscribe from this list >> >> On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Ted Van
> Beurden wrote: >>> Wouldn't be any point. A shortwave receiver covers more
> freqs (unless things have changed) and should receive just as well as a ham
> receiver. Unless you just want to listen to hams. Just my view. >> I'm
> mostly just mulling things over. I'm new to shortwave and don't take it
> very seriously, but I'm finding myself kind of annoyed at my astoundingly
> bad fortune in picking up number stations with my Grundig G5 with a whip
> antenna. I'd like to figure out whether it's because I need a better
> antenna, or a better radio, or because I'm overlooking something else, or
> simply because I'm doing something wrong. I'd say it's most likely the
> last one, but even so, I want to look at the other possibilities as well.
> >> ______________________________**______________________________**__ >>
> Spooks mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/**
> mailman/listinfo/spooks <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks>>> Help:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htm <http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> >>
> Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by:
> http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list:
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> >> > > ______________________________
> **______________________________**__ > Spooks mailing list > Home:
> http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/spooks<http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks>> Help:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htm <http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> >
> Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by:
> http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list:
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________**
> ______________________________**__ Spooks mailing list Home:
> http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/spooks<http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks>Help:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htm <http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>Post: mailto:
> Spooks at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please
> help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
III
______________________________________________________________
Spooks mailing list
Home: http://mail...
More information about the Spooks
mailing list