[Spooks] HAM Stuff [was: Re: Lincolnshire poacher]

[john]

Sure!

www.eham.net  has a lot of them!

( it's a ham site )  :-)

John



At 03:38 PM 10/7/2013, you wrote:
>Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from 
>this list Thank you for the information.  This is a lot more involved than 
>I would have thought. Do you know of any good web sites or other resources 
>that give reviews for radios and antennas (and any other important items 
>that would go along with them)?  I don't think I'll be able to afford any 
>major purchases until the government decides to let me go back to work 
>*growl* but I can at least take some time to read up on the subject. On 
>Oct 7, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote: > Visit 
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this 
>list > > Hi Parrish: > > The antenna is just as important as the radio. > 
>For receive applications the T2FD is hard to beat (and also for many 
>transmit applications). > http://www.prc68.com/I/RCS-5A.shtml#T2FD > I 
>claim that using a chirp receiver is the best way to evaluate a receive 
>antenna. > > A key radio specification is the IF bandwidth, the narrower 
>the better for detecting a signal. > Of course the IF needs to be as wide 
>as the signal to hear the modulation. > For example the HP 4395A spectrum 
>analyzer has a true 1Hz RBW, it's my most sensitive instrument. > 
>http://www.prc68.com/I/4395A.shtml#SA > > The NRD545 has a 10 Hz IF BW, 
>which is the narrowest receiver I have. > 
>http://www.prc68.com/I/NRD545.shtml > > > Have Fun, > > Brooke Clarke, 
>N6GCE > http://www.PRC68.com > 
>http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html > > Parrish S. Knight 
>wrote: >> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to 
>unsubscribe from this list >> >> On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Ted Van 
>Beurden wrote: >>> Wouldn't be any point.  A shortwave receiver covers 
>more freqs (unless things have changed) and should receive just as well as 
>a ham receiver.  Unless you just want to listen to hams. Just my view. >> 
>I'm mostly just mulling things over.  I'm new to shortwave and don't take 
>it very seriously, but I'm finding myself kind of annoyed at my 
>astoundingly bad fortune in picking up number stations with my Grundig G5 
>with a whip antenna.  I'd like to figure out whether it's because I need a 
>better antenna, or a better radio, or because I'm overlooking something 
>else, or simply because I'm doing something wrong.  I'd say it's most 
>likely the last one, but even so, I want to look at the other 
>possibilities as well. >> 
>______________________________________________________________ >> Spooks 
>mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks >> 
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: 
>mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: 
>http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: 
>http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> >> > > 
>______________________________________________________________ > Spooks 
>mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks > 
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: 
>mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: 
>http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: 
>http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
>______________________________________________________________ Spooks 
>mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: 
>http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks at mailman.qth.net This 
>list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: 
>http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

III