[Spooks] HAM Stuff [was: Re: Lincolnshire poacher]

[Carole C]

I agree...  But the question was whether it was lawful, not whether it made sense!

Carole




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ted Van Beurden" <tedvanbeurden at hotmail.com>
To: "Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations" <spooks at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Spooks] HAM Stuff [was: Re: Lincolnshire poacher]


Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list

Wouldn't be any point.  A shortwave receiver covers more freqs (unless things have changed) and should receive 
just as well as a ham receiver.  Unless you just want to listen to hams. Just my view.

Iyi geceler,
Ted in Turkey