[SOC] SOC web site hacked!

[Ray Day]

Hmmmmm......

How about: "We're NOT the FOC. We're the SOC. If you don't understand that,
you're in the right place. If you do understand that, you're in the wrong
place."

Now we're up to $0.04,
73,
Ray N6HE




-----Original Message-----
From: SOC [mailto:soc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Curt Steger
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:09 PM
To: Second Class Operators' Club
Subject: Re: [SOC] SOC web site hacked!

I too noticed this and wondered what sort of witchcraft was involved. 
Apparently someone from the club that shall not be named was feeling a
little butt-hurt about something maybe. Lord knows they would never be
intimidated by such a humble gathering as this.

I would prefer a much more subtle disclaimer that what the SOC currently
has. Something like,

Not associated with any other class of operators club, now get over it.

Just my $.02 worth.

Curt - NA7CS

On 6/10/2015 3:25 PM, Quikhooligan via SOC wrote:
> Honorable SOC members,
>
> I don't check the SOC web site very often.  I had my fill of 
> frustration the first time I visited there and never could find the 
> button. I had to be manually added to the membership roster by one of the
club officers.
>   So now, years later, I muster up enough courage to check the web 
> site again.  And it's a good thing I checked.  The web site appears to 
> have been hacked!  The web site appears mostly as it appeared years 
> ago but there was a line added smack dab in the middle of the page 
> with a RED font! It says:
>
> --> Not associated with the First Class CW Operators Club nor meant in
> any way to defame FOC <--
>
> Even Second Class Operators know that the SOC is not the FOC.  We're 
> not that dumb!
>
> And as far as not defaming FOC, was this possibly official SOC club 
> position ever submitted to a vote?  Yes, I might vote to approve such 
> a statement on the SOC web page but only if the FOC posts a similar 
> statement on their web site saying :
>
> --> Not associated with the Second Class Operators Club nor meant in 
> --> any
> way to defame SOC <--
>
> I checked.  You would think that in consideration of fairness, that 
> the statement would be there already.  Instead, for all to see on the 
> bottom of their page is this disclaimer:
>
>   "No part of this website may be reproduced or used externally 
> without the express consent of FOC."
>
> So why doesn't SOC have this nasty disclaimer on its web site?  I'll 
> tell you why.  We're nice guys (and gals).  All we have on the bottom 
> of our main page is this:
>
> "This WEB Site has received the prestigious Barney Award"
>
> Barney Awards are nicer than unfriendly legal disclaimers.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
> Message delivered to csteger515 at gmail.com
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email 
> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
SOC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
Message delivered to rayday at cox.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html