[SOC] Old Testament stuff

[w9ya]

Actually you have a right in Arizona to carry a firearm without any
permission from any government entity as per the constitution of your state.

Also the same here In New Mexico too. (It's called 'open-carry' and is
actually common, as I see people doing it everyday.)

Now which SOC member is gonna "pull a SOC" and spout off about how New
Mexico is not one of the "United States" ?

Vy 72;

- Bob
w9ya


On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Curt Steger <csteger515 at gmail.com> wrote:

> In the State of Arizona, I have the right to protect my property, and the
> lives of the people residing in my house. As such, if someone enters my
> home
> by force, or without my permission, I have the ability to defend my family
> and property. By deadly force if necessary. This has been validated many
> times in Arizona. This also holds true when you are in your car, on the
> street or in a store.
>
> We have the right to defend ourselves, unlike a majority of the U.S. and
> the
> world.
>
> Three examples, the first two from AZ, the third from Chicago.
>
> A passenger attempts to rob a cab driver by knife point; The cabbie draws
> his personal weapon, shoots and kills the robber. No charges filed against
> the cabbie, as the shooting was in self defense.
>
> Two men invade a home, the home owner shoots both intruders. One dies at
> the
> scene, the other is still in the hospital. No charges files against the
> homeowner as the shooting was in self defense.
>
> Two gang members invade an elderly female's residence and attempt to rob
> and
> rape her. The woman was in her 60's, and shot both intruders. The elderly
> paraplegic woman was charged with manslaughter, possession of a firearm and
> discharging a firearm within the city limits.
>
> But, if you do not agree with LEGAL, law abiding citizens having the
> ability
> to own and carry firearms, and defend themselves and their property; then I
> will respect your will and not use mine to defend you if the time ever
> arises.
>
> My definition of gun control is being able to hit your target. A lot of
> others define gun control as no one but the government owns guns. This
> worked particularly well for the likes of Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Chavez,
> Mao; the list goes on and on.
>
> Curt - NA7CS
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel at ngunn.net
> >wrote:
>
> > Curt.
> >
> > The second amendment refers to "A well regulated Militia, being necessary
> > to the security of a free State".
> >
> > That's what the army, and other military departments, do.
> > That doesn't give you the right to shoot a prospective trespasser or
> > burglar who, whilst a threat to you, is certainly
> > not a threat to your "free state".
> >
> > I would respectfully suggest that many Americans mis-interpret the
> > constitution so as to support their opinion.
> >
> >
> > Curt Steger wrote:
> >  I support the U.S. Constitution and the
> > > right of the LEGAL, law abiding citizens of America to keep and bear
> > arms.
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > SOC mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>