[SOC] The Turbo-Encabulator as applied to SOC

[Paul Bartlett]

Oh for goodness sake.

Everybody knows that if you miss out the deframdulator then the wobbleometer
is not going to work properly.

Sometimes I despair at the ignorance of current students.

Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: "JMcAulay" <john at mcaulay.net>
To: "Second Class Operators' Club" <soc at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: [SOC] The Turbo-Encabulator as applied to SOC


>
> Thank you, Wayne, for the most concise and clearly thorough explanation of
> the operation of this apparatus.  While I have long admired the earlier
> expositions of its operating characteristics, it has never before struck
me
> that a properly adjusted turbo-encabulator would achieve high efficiency
as
> a generator of sinusoidal waves whose voltage and current are in opposing
> phase,,, simply described, a producer of negative AC.  Or, properly
> designed for higher frequencies, negative RF.
>
> At 01:21 PM 08/21/2004 GMT, Wayne_W5KDJ wrote, in part:
> >
> >The TURBO-ENCABULATOR in INDUSTRY
>
> >snip<
>
> >The operating point is maintained as near as possible to the h.f. rem
> >peak by constantly fromaging the bitumogenous spandrels, This is a
> >distinct advance on the standard nivelsheave in that no dramcock oil is
> >required after the phase detractors have remissed.
>
> >snip<
>
> Not wishing to besmirch your efforts, but for the sake of greater
accuracy,
> I mention that the spelling of a word in this paragraph should be
> "bitumogeneous," rather than as shown.  You are to be commended for having
> keyed in such a plethora of highly technical writing with no other errors
> noted by me, quite a signal accomplishment.
>
> One can only hope that research and further construction of more advanced
> apparatuses will lead  interested experimenters into new and broader areas
> of application of the basic principles which you have outlined so
skilfully.
>
> I would be remiss were I not to point out that such equipment could make
> good use of the roticapac, a component developed by the writer in 1955.
> Basically a conductor separating two dielectrics, it plays an inverse role
> to its reversed cousin, the capacitor.  It should be seen easily that in
> the functioning of the roticapac, instead of charging, it pays cash.
>
> 73
> John WA6QPL  SOC 263
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> SOC at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>
> Mailman: User Guide for List Subscribers
> http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm