[SOC] presidential lies

[W1EOF]

> 3. Prove to me that he lied and he's dogmeat in my
> > eyes. I'm not a blind
> > "dittohead" for the right or the LEFT.
>
>   OK, here:
>
> http://www.house.gov/appropriations_democrats/caughtonfilm.htm
Partisan rhetoric, blah-blah. Nothing about Saddam seeking nuclear
materials.



> http://babelogue.citypages.com:8080/sperry/2003/06/16
More crap. Example? "4) UN documents support the Bush administration case
that Saddam had WMD." This is listed as a Bush lie. I'll bet they also
believe in the tooth-fairy too. This kind of make-up-your-own-reality cannot
be argued against logically since it's not based in reality.


> http://www.bushwatch.com/bushlies.htm
More of the same. On this site they compare statements from two people, at
two different times, in two different contexts that (seemingly) do not
agree. They call this a "Bush lie." "Evidence" for the
intellectually-challenged.


Sorry, but all of this is just so much left-wing, Democratic Party crap. On
the other side of the coin I can show you plenty of web sites that have
"proof" that President Clinton was a drug dealer, rapist, and murderer.
Heavily partisan sites like that only count if you are already a strong
believer in their crap before you get there. You'd have to be a real
"dittohead" to believe that crap. Seriously... I expect better from you
Lloyd.


> > 1. Clinton lied under oath to a Gran Jury, which is
> > a Felony. Last I knew
>
>   Mark, are you trying to "Frenchify" Grand Jury? Hee,
> hee. Sorry. Cheap shot.

Now THATS good. ;-)


73,

Mark W1EOF