[SOC] QSL.NET - Honorary Member

Fri, 31 May 2002 10:03:35 -0400

Would not j1 be more appropriate?  That would allow SOC to boast a complex
membership.  Or nonsubscribing members could have the prefix j affixed to
their number.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob N0UF" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [SOC] QSL.NET - Honorary Member

> Since SOC # 0 is issued,I further propose
> QSL.NET be issued SOC # 00,  # -1 or H1
> in keeping with the intent of the honor.
>
> 73
> Bob N0UF
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [SOC] QSL.NET is competiting SOCers !
>
>
> >
> > I do agree with this proposal ... Two crashes in one month, some emails
> not
> > received at [email protected] ... it really deserves an Honorary membership
!
> >
> > 73!
> > Claude, F5PBL
> >
> > http://www.qsl.net/f5pbl
> > http://www.qsl.net/soc
> >
> > DIG #4451 - FISTS #7722 - SOC #503 - 10-X #71724
> >
> > En r�ponse � Bob  N0UF <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Should we make qsl.net an Honorary SOC?
> > _______________________________________________
> > SOC mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
>
> _______________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc